Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Sius]

I definitely don't like this line.

I hope they read Suggestion threads at least or the whole section is useless.

Well sure they read it, but so far there were like five suggestions that have been realized and most of them were minorities.

[Surf]

I definitely don't like this line.

I hope they read Suggestion threads at least or the whole section is useless.

You don't like this line? You've modified my quote. I've never wrote that sentence you quoted there.
And I don't like when someone puts words in my mouth.

[avv]

It looks like there are many players with many ideas here. The main problem is, that the output of suggestions are almost zero. It is reasonable, because many of these ideas are in opposite to anothers. So i suggest, we must create some process, and result will be the most acceptable pvp changes accros all players.

 At first, i think that we must set a basic principles, ideas over ideas, "PvP constitution". The ideas will anwer us on question, WHAT WE WANT. There will exist many opposing ideas, so we have to make o public vote (but not with obligatory result, IMO).

Good idea, we certainly need some proper and gentlemannish conclave where to discuss things. So far our discussions here have been ravaged with random array of ideas pouring in and what's especially seen in suggestions forums: tactless language. We're not supposed to be like some group of teenages who constantly try to pick on each other of what we just said.

I guess it's just a matter of devs whether they want players to discuss this matter further. Because all we can do here in this thread and type of forum is to send our own ideas and comment them and probably just get lost since our subject is too massive. So far it's been only few people actively participating anyway, basically the whole forum has its around 50 regular users while the majority's voice isn't heard. Whatever they want to even say.

[Badger]

So far it's been only few people actively participating anyway, basically the whole forum has its around 50 regular users while the majority's voice isn't heard. Whatever they want to even say.

Yeah, I think at least 50% of the userbase hasn't made a post. And about 75% has made less than five.

[Kizz]

Well another thought is to have counters to the different types of weapons vs armor. Example - bullets with armor piercing is effective against kelvar armor. Hollow point bullets is effective against light armor, eg. leather armor. Than u also have armor that is good against plasma, laser weapons but bad against bullets. In other words, making more differentiating difference between the different types of guns/beam wpns and armor will make it more difficult to have the ultimate build. Than u have the regular armor that is decent against both type of weapons. In this way, there is no ultimate critical build or big gun build than can dominate all cuz the armor will be the limiting factor here, and u give everyone a fighting chance with the right protection.