listening only to people who tell you how awesome you are might be good for a therapy session, but it won't help you in making better development decisions.
I don't think I ever wrote about a place for yes-sayers. I meant a board for people who instead
of indulging in personal attacks (like you) give their feedback about features which are getting
implemented or planned by criticizing them in a polite, and more importantly - rational manner.
Another hilarious thing about this idea is that I suggested something like that with the players who'd be allowed to participate in such a closed forum being selected by the community via a popular vote
I think perhaps we meant two different things, because I didn't mean a place for some kind
of "community representation". I see no need for this kind of thing. In fact I find it unethical
and harmful, I would never want to force any player to be represented by a person they did
not choose and that's how elections work unless everyone agrees and votes the same person.
I meant a place for
everyone who can give their feedback to developers in acceptable manner,
and any person could be invited as long as they were capable to discuss like mature people.
Now, if a group of players instead of stating their opinion individually wants to choose someone
to write on their (and only their) behalf, nobody is stopping them from doing so. You can do it
even now. If they pick someone who will focus on personal attacks, flaming, sniping, posting
crap, such person could be simply ignored and not invited to such closed forum. At the same
time I see no reason why we couldn't invite any person who is capable to discuss like an adult,
just because the person didn't win some "community election".