fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • November 27, 2024, 08:19:35 am
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Author Topic: 2238 vs. TLA  (Read 11433 times)

Drakonis

  • Oh oh this is furtile...
  • Offline
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #45 on: March 17, 2010, 10:46:25 am »


yea this game is life draining to play lol,its hard to quit though cause it used to be so fun.

meh and it's hard to quit cause we all love "fallout" so much  ::)
Logged
"But... Isn't Betty a womans name...?"
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #46 on: March 17, 2010, 10:57:23 am »

is it possible to play on the TLA server?
Logged

Solar

  • Rotator
  • Offline
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #47 on: March 17, 2010, 01:20:47 pm »

Quote
However one biggest flaws in 2238 which brings so less interest in battle is the preview.

This was an inherited engine change from TLA ... are they now not using it?  :-\
Logged
Quote from: Woodrow Wilson
If you want to make enemies, try to change something.
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #48 on: March 17, 2010, 01:34:36 pm »

is it possible to play on the TLA server?

if you know russian - yes.
Logged
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #49 on: March 17, 2010, 06:43:55 pm »

You dont HAVE to know russian but it helps alot.I played there for a few months before the last wipe they had and did pretty good despite the language barrier,and the fact that american.Since all the towns are ungaurded there some gangs tend to police the one they own and if you go to the right place you will make friends.
Logged
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #50 on: March 18, 2010, 11:35:46 pm »

Playing abit on TLA atm since no point in being bored on 2238 before a wipe..
you can get by without knowing russian pretty well. atleast caravans speak english :P

Items are easy to come by and strangers give you gauss gun :P
Towns are filled with people.. no super powerful guards @ NCR but some players defend some towns themselfs.. which is alot cooler
Xp from critters doesn't decrease..
wish 2238 were more like TLA in those aspects

seems to lag more frequently than 2238, and god I swear ap recharges so slow, and walking in combat mode can be annoying(when ur walking to cave exit :P) it's good that combat mode is longer in pvp tho.
Logged

Sir Hubert

  • Chosen Soldiers
  • Offline
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #51 on: March 18, 2010, 11:39:39 pm »

lol yeah 1 hour and you have ca mingun rockets gauss etc its sux. 2238 is better beacause its harder here for eveything starting from exping and ending on find or buying good items. For me TLA is boring  all too easy to get there
Logged
Mistrz Dark Angel:
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #52 on: March 18, 2010, 11:54:12 pm »

lol yeah 1 hour and you have ca mingun rockets gauss etc its sux. 2238 is better beacause its harder here for eveything starting from exping and ending on find or buying good items. For me TLA is boring  all too easy to get there

its also boring to grind or when people nutcup / sit in ncr all day / dont visit towns with their equipment.. which is what you got on 2238
personally I dont want to spend ages doing boring shit so I can have some fun later.. don't want to waste my time like that.
Logged
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #53 on: March 19, 2010, 01:44:10 am »

I wouldn't mind trying another flavor of fallout online, just to compare and contrast.  What is TLA?  Do they have a website?
Logged
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world -- Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #54 on: March 19, 2010, 02:04:00 am »

TLA = just an other server... Mainly russian...
if you speak russian you'll be fine... but els you will have a hard time there.
(they used to shoot non-russian people on sight)
Logged
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #55 on: March 19, 2010, 02:34:55 am »

Is there an index of servers somewhere?
Logged
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world -- Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #56 on: March 19, 2010, 02:48:37 am »

There are just 2 servers. FOnline project is in beta, and only 2238 and TLA are available until the code is finished and released.
Logged
  Use your brain!
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #57 on: March 19, 2010, 05:18:32 am »

what do you mean finished and released? and wheres a link or something to play the TLA server?
Logged

Izual

  • Roaming entertainer.
    • Youtube
  • Offline
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #58 on: March 19, 2010, 08:44:44 am »

http://www.fo2238.fodev.net/wiki/TLA

To play on it just change the game port to 4000 instead of 2238.

Towns are filled with people.. no super powerful guards @ NCR but some players defend some towns themselfs.. which is alot cooler

Mostly, blame the players here for this :P On TLA, there is exactly as much use to guard towns as in 2238. As far as I remember, the only town that was guarded by players here on 2238 was Modoc, before Wipe - and it was really cool, as you say. I suppose that there are more gangs on 2238 that would just wish to destroy this ("Raiders roleplay") than in TLA.
Logged
My Youtube channel.

"Another problem is that we listen to the vocal players, who in many cases are wrong-headed."
- J.E. Sawyer

Pozzo

  • Tim Tom & Ted Lawyer Agency
  • Offline
Re: 2238 vs. TLA
« Reply #59 on: March 19, 2010, 09:19:39 am »

Quote
Mostly, blame the players here for this Tongue On TLA, there is exactly as much use to guard towns as in 2238. As far as I remember, the only town that was guarded by players here on 2238 was Modoc, before Wipe - and it was really cool, as you say. I suppose that there are more gangs on 2238 that would just wish to destroy this ("Raiders roleplay") than in TLA.

I don't agree. On TLA you can't run during battle. So if you want to attack a town you must be prepared to a long fight and defender have time to bring more people into fight. So, factions attack the cities only if they have a lot of people.
On 2238 you can attack, kill everybody loot and go in 10-20 sec.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
 

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 22 queries.