Other > Suggestions

Implement Tragic the Garnerning as Arcomage conversion.

<< < (3/10) > >>

RavenousRat:

--- Quote from: JovankaB on October 10, 2011, 06:13:21 PM ---Then I'm quite sure that it's a bit different than in M&M7, because you had some double cards there.
Also it could be the case that each player had it's own deck, but I don't remember.

--- End quote ---
Well then it's even more random, if each player will have his own deck, then there's no tactic at all, as you're both can do the same things, simply if you're getting better cards than your opponent, you'll win. I think 2 decks are really stupid to play. Also I can't remember well Arcomage in M&M7/8 as I played only once in each tavern just to earn gold and complete quest, and 11 games aren't much+playing with bot is a bit... boring and I wasn't interested much in this game in M&M7/8.

skejwen:
If theres is any legal issue then its not about trademark or patent but its all about ip (intellectual property). Beside I would rather see it in fallout design and not related to 2238 in any way ;)

JovankaB:

--- Quote from: skejwen on October 10, 2011, 08:13:17 PM ---If theres is any legal issue then its not about trademark or patent but its all about ip (intellectual property).
--- End quote ---

I think it's not that simple. IP is a basket for all kinds all laws. If you mean copyrights:

See: http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl108.html


--- Quote ---Copyright does not protect the idea for a game, its name or title, or the method or methods for playing it. Nor does copyright protect any idea, system, method, device, or trademark material involved in developing, merchandising, or playing a game. Once a game has been made public, nothing in the copyright law prevents others from developing another game based on similar principles. Copyright protects only the particular manner of an author’s expression in literary, artistic, or musical form.

Material prepared in connection with a game may be subject to copyright if it contains a sufficient amount of literary or pictorial expression.
--- End quote ---

Rules in a sense of game system can be patented if it's a new invention. Expression of these rules - the text in rulebook is copyrighted. But you can express the same rules in another way, with other words etc.

If copyright was enough, noone would patent new board games.

Sarakin:
Trademark, patent, IP.. you all know what was meant here - if it can be fully used in other projects.

Grommok:
Well, i was about to suggest making Tragic playable... so i like this suggestion. We need more "vanity" items to make the game more appealing-satisfing-funny.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page