Other > Off-topic discussions
New Vegas: shit or not shit?
corosive:
marcus is coming back in NV... What do people think about their uhm "New" guns? They added some modern weapons that aren't really fallout cannon.
Lexx:
All of the shit in Fallout 3 wasn't fallouty anymore. So the weapon that come with NV don't make anything worse. Also in case of weapons, you can't speak of "canon", as Bethesda decides, what canon is and what not. If Bethesda would like it, blue bunnies that conquer the earth could be canon as well.
brad smalls:
no i am not trolling this is what i turlly think my freinds like van buren will be the best and stuff no fallout 3 with its rpg greatness is the bomb i think fallour 2 is too hard for new comers well at least thats what i think but i am a enclave woreshiper so yeah
Surf:
I dont want to be the forum nazi, but either you watch atleast a bit of your grammar, some exclamation marks and so on, or we will have problems on here pretty soon, brad. I even respect your opinion, even if I would rather hang myself then applying that FO3 was a good game, but your posts here for sure look like trolling.
corosive:
Bethesda followed the Fallout timeline/ Bible to the tits didn't they?... the Fallout 3 story was technically made up in like 2002-2003 wasn't it? By Chris Avellone? Check this out http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline tell me if I'm wrong.
It says the data was compilled with the help of all datadisks from F1 to F3 but modified by Chris...
Anyhow I remember Bethesday bragging about how easy the story was to write because of the Bible...
Thoughts?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version