Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes

72 (53.3%)

No

63 (46.7%)

Total Members Voted: 134

[Vaimortal]

But you must admit, when they kicked you in Reno, it was APK behaviour, because youre PK right ? Tell me, why you are not banned yet ?

BTW. It wasnt only WWPs which were in Reno. Hawks and VSBs were there too, in count some 25+ people on some 4-6 PKs. What it is if not APK behavior ?  

You think im gonna get banned because of discussing the apk matter ? Do you even think with your head ?

Your logic is exactly like this , if PK's kill other PK's by your logic it means that's an APK act ! No really do you use your head for something useful other than being a complete " smart ass " every single post you make ?

First battle in reno was hillarious , we were dividing into to teams to leave reno , suddenly avv and his girls attack from behind , a rocket flies into like 7-8 members.

How can APK's and PK's even join forces ? How is that possible that their still APK's if they swore to kill outlaws ?

Is that APK behaviour ? I mean just shut up your obviously " not fit " to post here.

nasty we we pee http://img199.imageshack.us/i/wwpwashere3.jpg/

[Johnnybravo]

Peacekeepers for redding yeah.
http://img16.imageshack.us/i/wwpw.jpg/

The story behind that mass of people is quite simple.
We were capturing towns, and when we run out of towns to capture we gone 'drinking' in Redding's pub. But since none were there, we decided to go Reno where PKs were reported.
Obviously this was ment for fun, nobody would ever bother to maintain that huge group just to kick some asses, when much smaller group is sufficient, it was just that we had a lot of people and nothing more to do.

[Vaimortal]

The story behind that mass of people is quite simple.
We were capturing towns, and when we run out of towns to capture we gone 'drinking' in Redding's pub. But since none were there, we decided to go Reno where PKs were reported.
Obviously this was ment for fun, nobody would ever bother to maintain that huge group just to kick some asses, when much smaller group is sufficient, it was just that we had a lot of people and nothing more to do.

Yep this proves again there is no such thing as APK only PK's.

[naossano]

Sorry if it sounds a little dumb, but as i see things.

PKs shoots everyone on sight and defend themselves
APKs shoots PKs on sight and defend themselves
Neutrals doesn't shoot on sight but defend themselves
Ghandies doesn't shoot and don't  even defend themselves

PK need someone to shoot at. (or get bored)
APK need PK to shoot at. (or get bored and useless)
neutral need peace. (or can't do their business)
Ghandies need to change their mind. (or get killed by PK)

So the first two group, at least, need pvp, need some fights.
So, APK are not ghandies.
All the 4 groups are able to troll.

WWP gathers APK, neutrals and ghandies.
So, it never simple.

[headshot]

That's the exact opposite of RP, isn't it? Just admit you're a bunch of poor trolls.

Not excatly. Militia protects us against small scale attacks. I don't like militia replacement but it's necessary to increase safety of visitors against potential threats.
RP dosen't matter here. Have you been there when we've started this project (before WWP was founded)? I guess no if you don't know what I'm talking about...

[Stration]

Not excatly.

'Replacing' militia = abusing game mechanics = the exact opposite of RP.

Can you imagine this happening in real life? You take over a town and ask some of the citizens to protect it, then kill the ones you consider too weak? I don't think so, Tim. You're nothing but a bunch of munchkins, pure and simple.

Frankly, I'm growing weary of more and more of all that WWP-related spam. Imagine what would happen if *every* PK advertised his trap(s) so persistently, and take a hike.

 

[Andr3aZ]

'Replacing' militia = abusing game mechanics = the exact opposite of RP.

Can you imagine this happening in real life? You take over a town and ask some of the citizens to protect it, then kill the ones you consider too weak? I don't think so, Tim. You're nothing but a bunch of munchkins, pure and simple.

lol RP. lol realism.

Frankly, I'm growing weary of more and more of all that WWP-related spam. Imagine what would happen if *every* PK advertised his trap(s) so persistently, and take a hike.

Threads and spam made by non-WWP. What do you expect? They jelly and mad 

[Michaelh139]

When wwp members go to reno/tc, it's their personal activity and has nothing to do with what we do in Redding.

Wrong. We have a ruleset for troubblemaker gang members who haven't caused troubble in Redding. If such player wants to enter, he has four choices:

1. The guy leaves his previous gang
2. His gang makes a truce with wwp and refunds all (an astronomical ammount of) material losses they have caused to us.
3. He doesn't enter the town.
4. If there's very good reasoning why he should be allowed in, it can be discussed.

Reasoning behind this is that the player might very likely use our goodwill to gather information about our most active guards and public ongoings. Another reason is to show that players can't just do whatever they want. Their actions and choices have consequences.

Your "law" is hypocritical.

[Andr3aZ]

Your "law" is hypocritical.

why that? WWP runs redding including safety to a certain degree. You come to redding you obey or make trouble, your choice.

If WWP Member go elsewhere they do the same. As for example if WWP would visit BH under BHH control and active town safety WWP would obey their laws too and try to diplomate. If they go to Reno they can have fun like everybody else because there are no rules/lawkeepers.

We care about redding and are not going to visit every unguarded city, throw around flowers and tell hubertus he should not kill that poor bluesuit.

[Michaelh139]

why that? WWP runs redding including safety to a certain degree. You come to redding you obey or make trouble, your choice.

If WWP Member go elsewhere they do the same. As for example if WWP would visit BH under BHH control and active town safety WWP would obey their laws too and try to diplomate. If they go to Reno they can have fun like everybody else because there are no rules/lawkeepers.

We care about redding and are not going to visit every unguarded city, throw around flowers and tell hubertus he should not kill that poor bluesuit.

wwp members can apparently go anywhere and do whatever they want as long as its not "crimes" while inside redding.  Not that it matters because they do this anyway.

yet people not in the gang apparently can be killed without warning or reason in redding.  It doesn't make any sense.  Unless your a pk.

[avv]

wwp members can apparently go anywhere and do whatever they want as long as its not "crimes" while inside redding.  Not that it matters because they do this anyway.

yet people not in the gang apparently can be killed without warning or reason in redding.  It doesn't make any sense.  Unless your a pk.

Yes our freetime activities have nothing to do with Redding. WWP members can do whatever they want beyond Redding, unless they act as representatives of the gang.

Ofcourse someone can be killed in Redding without warning but reasons always exist. The reasoning can be anything, first we're interested in knowing what the reason was and after that if it was justified.

[T-888]

wwp members can apparently go anywhere and do whatever they want as long as its not "crimes" while inside redding.  Not that it matters because they do this anyway.

yet people not in the gang apparently can be killed without warning or reason in redding.  It doesn't make any sense.  Unless your a pk.

Well it makes sense to me , the same anarchists and pk's with a town to protect. Basicly they are the same people that redding is protected from. This leads to a funny thing that technically when WWP members are out of town they should be considered as a potential threat to redding , because their outlaws and pk's. just speculating.

I have based this thought on avv's " do whatever they want beyond Redding " , sounds like anarchy for me.

[manero]

You still play this game? Unbelieveable...

[Andr3aZ]

Well it makes sense to me , the same anarchists and pk's with a town to protect. Basicly they are the same people that redding is protected from. This leads to a funny thing that technically when WWP members are out of town they should be considered as a potential threat to redding , because their outlaws and pk's. just speculating.

I have based this thought on avv's " do whatever they want beyond Redding " , sounds like anarchy for me.

hurr hurr im exploiting your laws against you because im so clever! like we give a fuck. We do this for fun.
Let me quote a guy who tells da truth!

Actually I don't give a fuck about this poll, like everybody here. What the point of this crap, when the biggest part of the server is trigger happy ? What the point when most of people continuously ask us to justify our behavior whereas they act like badasses all the time ?
So, for now on, don't expect any explanation, justification, argument... from our team, cause we're sick and tired. You just have to know we try to stick to our roleplay, like we do since a year. We don't care about the PK/APK stuff, we just follow the Great Law. Deal with it.

[runboy93]

You still play this game? Unbelieveable...

You play this game after wipe (damn i wait to see how many players online at that day )
And we play this to the end.