I love how this simple suggestion on changing the ammo size/damage turned into a debate about real-life guns vs in-game guns, and every single detail about that... ugh.
its like a videogamer canon the fact of know about weapons. IS AWESOME
also all need to know:
1.-A scope is a WEAPON ATACHMENT, of course there are natural snipers, designed for be snipers, and you cant use them without scopes
2.-Every weapon can be atached with a scope, i remember in the Vietnam War the support weapon for snipers was the M1A1 carbine with scope, and in the recent wars most guerrillas use FAL with scopes as snipers, (while there is no Dragunov sniper)
3.-Tought it not good to use automatic guns as snipers because they lose precision, and you dont need a lot of shots, only one. (first FAL was semi-automatics)
It will be very good to have scopes for atach to weapons, but maybe the engine and game system wont let devs make this, tough they can expand the range of the weapons, but this is exploitable
Also im still thinking that tommy and grease guns need to still in 1tier being unpowerful weapons, there was designed to this, most of us culd think that tommys are powerful for all that mafia movies, but no, tommy is shit, cheap and scaring.
About fallout timeline. Why we have P90 and H11?
whatever H11 should be craftable, just little nerfed...