fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • December 23, 2024, 09:28:18 am
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog

Poll

old TC

yes
- 43 (53.1%)
no
- 3 (3.7%)
i like pie
- 35 (43.2%)

Total Members Voted: 79


Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Previous TC back , please !  (Read 5737 times)

Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2012, 04:41:52 pm »

One feature that kept me playing 2238 is now broken and who knows when the fixes will be done.

So i am suggesting to just bring back previous TC system until fixes are made and updated. It's not perfect , but that TC at least provided basic things that TC should provide like relatively rapid exchange of cities and timer along with working beacon that provided some PvP once in a while.

All i'm asking is for the opportunity to continue enjoying 2238 server , because at the moment there is literally nothing to enjoy ...



How long are we going to have to play like this ?

Och, I see that you started crying about your "ally" - The Fist. What is diffrent with it? You took cities same way like they, but they were only 4 for so it"ll take time to gain 500 influence. Anyway they have long way to take it, for now we have 150 influence there.

It's fair. Not like hotel or Bos camping earlier ;D
Logged
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2012, 04:50:03 pm »

It's about the principle how TC is done in general - camping buildings.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2012, 06:54:16 pm by Graf »
Logged

runboy93

  • 'Insanity'
    • MyAnimelist Profile
  • Offline
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #17 on: April 22, 2012, 04:56:19 pm »

It won't help 2238.
True, this game already done enough damage to Internet and ppls around world :/
It should be already time to.. go to eternal sleep :)
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #18 on: April 22, 2012, 05:04:11 pm »

It's about the principle how TC is done in general - camping buildings.
We DID NOT STARTED this, as i remember u captured first city, so why u choose us as example?
After wipe this is best way to took city - hidden alts in city, yeah influence grown up  8)
« Last Edit: April 22, 2012, 06:54:39 pm by Graf »
Logged

Perteks

  • It's made of vague and to do lists!
  • Offline
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #19 on: April 22, 2012, 05:11:23 pm »

Gosh  chosen retards in all of their class

Previous TC system - milita = enough to be good
Logged
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2012, 05:13:12 pm »

It should be already time to.. go to eternal sleep :)

Then maybe you should make a suggestion to shut down this server. No ? Don't waste time if your so very sure about it.

We DID NOT STARTED this, as i remember u captured first city, so why u choose us as example?
After wipe this is best way to took city - hidden alts in city, yeah influence grown up  8)

It's irrelevant for me who is in the screen , might as well been us , but sorry for not making screens of ourselves camping buildings. It doesn't change the fact that we have. That screen was made like 30 minutes before i made this topic. Only because it's recent , if you can't accept that , well i just plainly don't give a fuck. Understand ?

I made this topic to make a viable point about the reimplementation of old TC system for undetermined period of time , not who has camped some buildings and who has used militia , can't get even more irrelevant than that.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2012, 05:17:17 pm by T-888 »
Logged
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2012, 05:15:37 pm »

I bet the faction who got the guts to wait entire days in town would be quite mad if someone take it back in 15 minutes.
There should be a middle-way...
Logged
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #22 on: April 22, 2012, 05:18:31 pm »

Look at it from this point of view. Two factions that has waited and camped entire days , can take the city from each other in 30 seconds. Now tell me what do you prefer more ?

There's no middle ground.
Logged

Michaelh139

  • Goin for 900,000...
  • Offline
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #23 on: April 22, 2012, 06:25:42 pm »

Say, does anyone have files for requiem client?

For the love of god, every time I go for the link on their site it does not work.  Very irritating.

Oh yeah, about the topic.

No shit.
Logged
Whenever I say something, imagine \"In my opinion"/ being in the front of every sentence.

Killer Rabbit

  • Guest
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #24 on: April 22, 2012, 06:46:01 pm »

what is wrong with you t888? When coa took redding you were laughing at Them they can cało with militia and other crap. Now when we took bh and you know what that is mean you start to crying about it because we can fight with u on equal lvl
« Last Edit: April 22, 2012, 06:52:44 pm by Graf »
Logged
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #25 on: April 22, 2012, 06:53:52 pm »

According to statistics, fonline players like old TC and pie.
Logged
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #26 on: April 22, 2012, 07:16:16 pm »

Heh. That's good , the poll is quite one sided in terms of denial there's pretty much none at all. That's something you don't see very often on this forum. Pie is always good , that's something nice and positive. Seriously. :)
Logged

avv

  • Offline
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #27 on: April 22, 2012, 09:07:27 pm »

Old tc with fastrelogs and sd sneaks is still going to suck.
Logged
Based on evidence collected from various sources by trustworthy attendees it is undisputed veritability that the land ravaged by atomic warfare which caused extreme change of the ecosystem and environmental hazards can be considered unpleasant, rugged and unforgiving.
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #28 on: April 23, 2012, 01:34:57 am »

New TC whenever it comes wouldn't be ?
Logged

Sarakin

  • Zmikundik
    • Vault šílené brahmíny
  • Offline
Re: Previous TC back , please !
« Reply #29 on: April 23, 2012, 05:45:12 pm »

Current TC isnt what we have expected from it, but step back to former TC is even worse if you ask me.
Logged
The sanctity of this forum has been fouled

[19:41:06] <@JovankaB> einstein said we dont need name colorizing
Pages: 1 [2] 3
 

Page created in 0.099 seconds with 28 queries.