fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • November 22, 2024, 07:10:37 pm
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Traits more reasonable?  (Read 1174 times)

Kostuch

  • Bandits! 2'o clock! 6'o clock!
    • FreeSpace Polish Board
  • Offline
Traits more reasonable?
« on: January 27, 2010, 10:30:45 am »

There are pairs of traits that should not be taken both - it simply makes no sense. I'm talking about Bruiser and Small Frame, Chem Resistant and Chem Reliant, Finesse and Heavy Handed. IMO if player decides to choose one of them, the another should not be avialable to take.  :)
Logged
"Expect the best while being prepared for the worst"
Re: Traits more reasonable?
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2010, 11:18:46 am »

Don't worry. Nobody is taking them anyway in that configuration.
Logged

Lexx

  • Rotator
  • Mexican Apple Thief
  • Offline
Re: Traits more reasonable?
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2010, 12:12:13 pm »

It's the players choice to take whatever trait he wants to... and if he can't decide, he doesn't have to take a trait at all.
Logged

Kostuch

  • Bandits! 2'o clock! 6'o clock!
    • FreeSpace Polish Board
  • Offline
Re: Traits more reasonable?
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2010, 12:15:02 pm »

Yes, I understand you, but my aim was to point a nonsense (being big/small at the same time, being resistant/reliant at the same time etc.), not to reduce player's freedom. If you like it as it is for now, that's fine. :)
« Last Edit: January 27, 2010, 12:17:22 pm by Kostuch »
Logged
"Expect the best while being prepared for the worst"
Re: Traits more reasonable?
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2010, 12:42:23 pm »

I have 3 character with finesse/HH , and it works damn good , fyi   8)
Logged
Re: Traits more reasonable?
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2010, 07:54:00 am »

same with my bruiser and small frame fo2 +2 in INT
Logged
Pages: [1]
 

Page created in 0.097 seconds with 22 queries.