Other > Off-topic discussions

fallout 1 ,2 or 3 which is your favourite

<< < (3/7) > >>

Lexx:
Fallout 1, because 2 added too much silly and annoying lulziness. I don't even want to talk about 3.

RavenousRat:
Of couse Fallout 1, 2nd fallout long and boring except for Klamath, Den and Reno. Fallout 1 shows everything, I played Fallout 1 very long time ago, but week ago I replayed it again and Fallout 2. I bored at F2 on 2nd playing hour, and don't think I'll play it again. Fallout 2 is good, but only because it's continuation of Fallout 1 (don't take in account that it's more newer Fallout so it has more items/perks/comfortable to play). Fallout 2 is only you completed Fallout 1, killed overseer in the end watched movie how your character goes in the desert, and... end. And you want to continue playing. Fallout 2 itself without 1st not a game. Also replaying Fallout 1 showed me true BoS... because I barely can remember anything when I was 10 years old when I last time played Fallout 1.
Fallout Tactics and Fallout 3 totally other story and has almost nothing with orginal Fallout. Fallout Tactics is interesting to play alone for sniper using sneak and real time only, while Fallout 3... I think Oblivion much more better than Fallout 3, they shouldn't have done this.

LagMaster:
Fallout 1,is short and easy,i like it

Ned Logan:
Fallout 2, because I played it first, because it was funny (it had Harold!), had lots of freedom and I got into it more than Fallout 1 (also less bugs and you could play after the game ended (and wipe out the cities 8) ) with no patch).

Lexx:

--- Quote ---(it had Harold!)
--- End quote ---

And Fallout 1 didn't?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page