Other > Closed suggestions
GM abuse counteraction, GM activity to be made transparent
Nice_Boat:
--- Quote from: HertogJan on July 20, 2010, 01:02:29 pm ---Don't accuse others of trolling while you're the biggest throll in this thread.
The situation with Reconite (I assume happened before I started playing) has been solved.
Case closed, move on.
GMs have certain powers, the only way to prevent GMs from abusing them is to remove all GMs.
Sure some measures can be taking to lower the risk of abusive behavior, but completely preventing it is impossible.
--- End quote ---
Reaction time was ridiculously long because there's no mechanisms whatsoever in place to detect such misbehaviour... because people like you are protesting against it. Care to explain what exactly is going to hurt you if a few people were checking whether GMs are abusing or not? You'd gain the right to appeal any decision they make and lose nothing. In fact, the community as a whole would only gain from that.
--- Quote from: HertogJan on July 20, 2010, 01:02:29 pm ---I might be misunderstanding your posts here, but you're still suggesting it between the lines.
--- End quote ---
No, and once again - the Devs approve of what I proposed when it comes to a single entity overwatching GMs. They disallow general access to logs, that's all.
--- Quote from: HertogJan on July 20, 2010, 01:02:29 pm ---Arguments have been made, but as I said in an earlier reply, you chose to ignore them instead of discussing them.
--- End quote ---
So you sure are capable of making a summary of this thread with arguments brought up by either side? It'd be fun to read I bet.
--- Quote from: HertogJan on July 20, 2010, 01:02:29 pm ---Again, better pick 1 who's above the parties with conflicting interests.
--- End quote ---
Care to name such a person? Because I've been here for a long time and I honestly can't aside from the Dev-team, which sadly can't and shouldn't be bothered with such issues.
Kilgore:
--- Quote from: HertogJan on July 20, 2010, 12:34:11 pm ---A system of complaints and appeal is something different than a system which give players a level of control over GMs.
--- End quote ---
Was such system (which gives players a level of control over GMs) suggested here so far?
skejwen:
Well - in fact we should abandon GM function as it seems that its not necessary at all :)
Badger:
Does anyone even read those back and forth post dissections?
--- Quote ---You are a dick
--- End quote ---
No you're a dick.
--- Quote ---You're an even bigger dick
--- End quote ---
Oh okay I guess I never saw it that way
Shangalar:
I never saw happy end in a discussion where everyone is quoting the other and camping his position.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version