Other > Off-topic discussions

Fallout VS. S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series

<< < (2/3) > >>

Pandemon:
WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT ANY SHITTY FALLOUT 3  :-X
It's not belong to Fallout Series, only Fallout 1 and Fallout 2 created by Interplay.

OhShi:
ah, i just assumed. In that case they are incomparable.

Haraldx:
Heh, Fallout 3 is really a piece of time waste. STALKER can be ran on slower computers even with an old Nvidia 5600, while Fallout 3 needs a dumb 6800 (I have 6200, but I played it at friends, it has got nothing more then beautiful graphics). STALKER and Fallout somehow make them similiar to me, maybe it's because of the radioactive and unpredictable surroundings. Indeed Fallout 1/2 is an old game, while they are still being played more and being modded even more then played. 

Michaelh139:
Best thing about the Bethesda fail verison of Fallout was that there weren't an abundance of...  

"Chest High walls"  ;D.


Well considering it was an fps that is.

Nice_Boat:
STALKER with Supermod ( http://www.moddb.com/mods/super-mod-pack ) simply kicks ass. I voted both were awesome because I love them both, but to be honest - I think Fallout 1 and 2 are slightly superior in terms of entertainment factor. I mean, their gameplay is just so much deeper. But then again, Fallout doesn't have epic firefights interrupted by a blowout which sends you and your enemies covering in a bunker resulting in CQB which was way beyond the intensity of the previous battle. Or me bartering with some dude, trying to sell him a gun only to see his head explode in my face because a sniper shot him and some guys were attacking his encampment. And yes, both actually happened during my playthrough and both weren't scripted.

Also, Fallout 3 never happened. Yes, denial helps 8)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page