Other > Off-topic discussions

Fallout VS. S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series

(1/3) > >>

Haraldx:
I really do preffer playing STALKER then Fallout. Fallout always seemed just a bit too linear, and not even talking how much of a failure was Fallout 3. STALKER has more like survival stuff and hasn't got secrets where you can go to one place, open the locker and get best armor, a Gauss Gun, shitloads of ammunition and you can't just rob people to get everything. STALKER CoP + Me + Sniper Rifle + bandits going to shoot someone = cool sniping sneaky skills + fun.

Pandemon:
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. - 3D game similar to every other new FPS/RPG
Fallout - 2D (isometric) game unique in their times with great plot and a lot of quests. Now it seems linear but in their times that was something great :)

Hydro:

--- Quote from: Haraldx on July 12, 2010, 12:00:50 pm ---I really do preffer playing STALKER then Fallout. Fallout always seemed just a bit too linear, and not even talking how much of a failure was Fallout 3. STALKER has more like survival stuff and hasn't got secrets where you can go to one place, open the locker and get best armor, a Gauss Gun, shitloads of ammunition and you can't just rob people to get everything. STALKER CoP + Me + Sniper Rifle + bandits going to shoot someone = cool sniping sneaky skills + fun.



--- End quote ---
Fallout 3 doesn't belong to fallout series imo- it is just stupid shooter with active pause. I played both games and Fallout is about a world and moral choices, when stalker is nice fps that can kick butt, but better effect is when you playing this at night

EDIT: Linear? Hmm even after about 10 years it is still game, that you need end more than once, because there are many options to create character and world reactions

Surf:
Fallout and STALKER have nothing in comparison, gameplaywise nor story/setting wise.
The only thing you may see in both games is a radiation sign. ::)

So I don't see a point in this thread, also titles with "ABC VERSUS XY" mostly just lead to silly things.

OhShi:
STALKER is a much better FPS with awesome guns and a laughable storyline with minor RPG elements (only equipment and upgrades)

Fallout 3 is a shocking FPS with awful guns and a cool storyline with major RPG elements (Oblivion with guns)

STALKER's gameplay is realistic, bullet physics are incorporated and you spend a lot of time sneaking around groups of enemies or running from monsters.

Fallout 3's gameplay is a bit.. well.. easy. Sneak is overpowered, VATS is overpowered, Damage resistance can get ridiculously high, ammo doesn't weigh anything, stimpaks are everywhere and a good player can get every skill to 100.

STALKER has amazing environments that are quite explorable, you can even climb a few things and sometimes find secret stashes in attics and stuff. The map is split into bits, with annoying chokepoints to get to different areas. The buildings are very well suited for the gameplay, but in some instances they wouldn't make much sense in the real world and are a bit linear and bare.

Fallout 3 has amazing environments that are quite explorable, every single house has a secret stash in it (bad thing). HUGE map with no loading screens and even though they reused a lot of static houses and interiors the loot and layout is different in every single one, you can tell a lot of care went into every block of Fallout 3's environment. There are a lot more places to explore and secrets to find.

STALKER's wasteland is harsh, scary and dark

Fallout 3's wasteland is not.. but it's soooo pretty

They both have a very active modding community.
I was part of a major mod for stalker so I am a bit biased when I say STALKER is easier to mod.

They are both full of glitches.

They both have strange NPC behavior.

In conclusion, a glitch-free combination of the two games would be the best game ever made and would bring peace to the world (no time for war, everyone would be inside playing it)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page