Other > General Game Discussion
FN FAL HPFA
Drakonis:
--- Quote from: Lordus on May 17, 2010, 04:41:23 PM --- This is the different point of veiw. If EW will be superior to SG, in pvp there will be no SG sniper.. it is fact. Only best PvP chars are in PvP. If you lower this resistance, BG will protest, because they will not be so strong like now, and because nobody wants to nerf anything, they will raise BG power.
--- End quote ---
ugh should players really care about whining Bigguners when they loose some of their ultimate supremacy?
And yes I actually i know what im talking about. 2 BIgguners lvl 21 now, 2 SG snipers(6 and 10 luck) and 1 energy sniper. I can easly tell that if you can afford your ammo(just ammo coz lsw is a caravan drop) then you have an utimate hitting power over long range, shitload of AP, AOE attack, Partialy resistant to blind/psycho effects(bigguns does not require that much % to max chance to hit, unlike other guns)
Right now we have a reverse situation. everybody uses Small guns because they are better than energy guns. If energy guns would be a BIT better than small guns(especially on medium distance), then some people would still use SG and some would use EW: why? EW are hard to get/hard to craft and ammo is shitty expensive. Well we at least would have SOME diversity :(. I know devs wanted to make EW rare, but this should not be achieved by making them worse in PVP in a PVP based game. Making them expensive with hard to get ammo?: YES. Making them shit: OH GOD NO
Tyler:
This is truly a question and not in any way an attempt to prove anyone wrong.
I see alot of people talking about how well armors protect from laser and plasma damage, which it does very well, but whenever i encounter an energy weapon im shot in the head or the eyes.These hits usually result in loads of damage and i dont survive many of them.Since its pretty much like you guys say and everyone is going to do whatever is most effective in a fight i ask why everyone is so concerned about how resistant armor is to lasers when everyone is eye shooting anyway?Do the visors on CA actually offer the same protection for the head and eyes as the rest does for the torso and limbs?
Like i said, not an attempt to derail anyone, im just curious.
Drakonis:
--- Quote from: Tyler on May 17, 2010, 06:39:10 PM ---This is truly a question and not in any way an attempt to prove anyone wrong.
I see alot of people talking about how well armors protect from laser and plasma damage, which it does very well, but whenever i encounter an energy weapon im shot in the head or the eyes.These hits usually result in loads of damage and i dont survive many of them.Since its pretty much like you guys say and everyone is going to do whatever is most effective in a fight i ask why everyone is so concerned about how resistant armor is to lasers when everyone is eye shooting anyway?Do the visors on CA actually offer the same protection for the head and eyes as the rest does for the torso and limbs?
Like i said, not an attempt to derail anyone, im just curious.
--- End quote ---
Because EW user have a chance only if he gets lucky enough to both crit AND armor bypass. Not all shots become critical, and not many bypass armor at all ;] All shots vs metal armor and up are lame. You might have been runing around in leather or something since it doesnt protect against lasers or plasma.
Tyler:
Im aware of how well these armore protect Drakonis but im asking if they also protect the eyes and head.No one ever has any metal helmets on their heads and Ca has a visor but i wonder if it even works.
Solar:
Laser rifles are generally 10 worse vs Metal armours (25 worse vs Tesla), ~30 better vs Leather armours then +1 vs CA and -1 vs BA and CAII per 10 AP.
or from bluesuit to BoS CA a Sniper Rifle is (approx): -46.7% -40.0% -48.1% -51.1% -49.1% 69.3% 104.9% 710.8% -6.1% 5.3% 5.5%
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version