Other > Suggestions
Hinkley changes
Nice_Boat:
The IN requirement is ridiculous. I went there today for the first time in a few months, tried to get my gear, was like "hahah oh wow, really?", asked my teammates whether this bs was serious and just left without playing. I'm really curious whose idea was it, because it doesn't serve any practical purpose aside from maybe griefing on the part of the dialogue maker. I mean it could just as well be a joke, but if that's the case it failed and it makes competing a chore for PvP builds that are otherwise perfectly viable.
Fun fact: removing that would take one double click, loading a .fodlg file, one single click, pressing delete, saving the file and committing it to the server. I bet the update fixing this issue is going to hit "soon", if ever.
John Porno:
you just need to make a hinkley alt to sandbox him in and give you gear because that's what the devs want, right?
I still remember a readme or something from when I first discovered fonline that said not to make too many alts to decrease server load. oh well.
T-888:
No , keep a logged off character near outfitter. No need to use sandbox and legally cheat.
DaroPL:
Yeah add all and be indestructible
Hololasima:
When i tried to say "hey that requirement for INT is just stupid, remove it" in past, noone supported me. But yeah, that requirement is just stupid and should be removed.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version