Other > General Game Discussion

What do you think of the auto knock down from heavy handed?

<< < (3/17) > >>

Solar:
Stonewall needs to beat HH. It will do when fixed.

I also think I will have HH work as Str -5 instead of a Str roll, then ignore the -5 if using a PF or MPF ... so its not quite so good when using naked fists.

Crazy:

--- Quote from: Solar on January 19, 2012, 11:01:34 pm ---Stonewall needs to beat HH. It will do when fixed.

I also think I will have HH work as Str -5 instead of a Str roll, then ignore the -5 if using a PF or MPF ... so its not quite so good when using naked fists.

--- End quote ---
THAT is a good idea!

Nobody:
What do you mean by beat? Negate it completely or just lower the chance?

Solar:
I mean if the HH and stonewall rolls were both passed, the stonewall effect would be enacted

Wallace:

--- Quote from: Solar on January 19, 2012, 11:43:22 pm ---I mean if the HH and stonewall rolls were both passed, the stonewall effect would be enacted

--- End quote ---

That is a good idea. It should be so that stonewall would work in this case. I had similar idea;
Whoever rolls higher wins for example we have 8EN stonewaller and 7STHeavyHander
HH rolls 2 and stone rolls 7.  Both pass the check but HH passed with greater bufor thus he wins = K.D.

If HH would roll 5 and tank 6 = tie -> defender wins (stonewaller)

HH doesnt pass and stonewall passes check then obviously still stands


You don't need to further nerf it coz you simply may run away from pugilist so i see HHs as an opportunity to even the odds (pre wipe every HtH fighter would be pawned by any gunner)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page