fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • December 24, 2024, 12:27:17 am
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 15

Author Topic: New Vegas: shit or not shit?  (Read 50015 times)

gordulan

  • General Animosity
  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #150 on: April 08, 2010, 01:32:28 pm »

exactly, the world does not give a shit where the money's coming from, and besides, i liked fallout 3, it didn't feel like a fallout, but it was a good game, all in all
Logged
 
http://tf-2.fr/ach.php?a=Bend Over, Boyo II&b=Shoot 150 people as they are running away from you... In the arse&c=56&d=150&e=1703&f=1
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #151 on: April 08, 2010, 06:42:27 pm »

I just wish they had tested it as much as oblivion, it felt really unpolished and had a ton of bugs considering it was pretty much just a total conversion mod.
Logged
 

Aricvomit

  • Prepare for bowel disruption
  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #152 on: April 08, 2010, 09:02:38 pm »

yeah, well honestly bethesda must hate the ps3. i played through the ps3 version and there were way more bugs, no downloadable content for months after they were released for the pc and the xbox and it was the same way with oblivion, im tellin ya valve and bethesda suckle the teat of microsoft.
Logged
plasma nade your face off!
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #153 on: April 08, 2010, 09:19:18 pm »

PS3 always gets owned with dlc, one of the many reasons I prefer xbox.
Logged
 

Aricvomit

  • Prepare for bowel disruption
  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #154 on: April 08, 2010, 09:20:24 pm »

heheh that and the 80% breakdown rate?
Logged
plasma nade your face off!
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #155 on: April 09, 2010, 11:12:13 pm »

Oh, what a fucking myth, aricvomit. RRODs stopped since the Jasper came back in the 2008, and even on the Falcon they happened rarely. And if some happens these days on a fresh box, its usually the users fault by cooking the box in a closed shelf under a pillow with heater next to it.
Logged
I give a fuck.
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #156 on: April 10, 2010, 01:57:35 am »

I use all the systems at work and the reasons i hate ps3 are as follows:
-Tiny badly designed controller with shitty levers instead of triggers
- no anti aliasing so everything is jaggy as shit
- no ps3 only titles worth playing (unless you like watching 2 hour cut scenes)
- Heats up like a motherfucker, you culd toast bread over a ps3
- Has the same font as spider man movie on the case
- Garbage online service (you get what you pay for)
- 1x blue ray player means loading times are insanely long
Logged
 

Aricvomit

  • Prepare for bowel disruption
  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #157 on: April 12, 2010, 04:53:09 am »

ANNNND heres where you favoritism comes into play, first off the ps3 controller is by far the best, better then the clunky picasso like xbox controller, the d-pad is 100% better then the xbox's as it is recessed and allows for accurate movement, playing street fighter 4 on an x-box is the equivalent to smashing my brains out with a hamme
 the online service is great for the ps3,, and heres another one, its free,
 i have a friend that fixes red rings and ill tell you this, when x-box fixes a system it doesent send out a new one, they just repair the old ones they have a kabillion of because so many go sent back, so they keep cycling faulty box's.
 i dont know a single person personally thats ever had a ps3 die on them, yet everyone i know that owns an x-box has gone through at least 2 box's, so explain to me how its bullshit especially when ive witnessed this crap personally.
 oh and as for the games the reign of x-box's exclusive titles is over, now everything gets released on both systems and the exclusives that do come out for the systems are generally flagship titles, honestly you guys can keep halo, that game makes me ill. id much rather play mgs 4 or little big planet, or killzone.
 but in short, x-box lost the media format war, blu ray discs are a much better medium and instead of getting a 4 disc game we get one, ill deal with slight load times seeing as the games are installed on the system nullifying most load times, oh wait didnt the x-box add that? yeah cause it was a good idea, do x-box's even have a functioning internet browser? or built in wifi?
 as for the systems being hot, well it doesent matter because they were designed to play hot, you wont leave star ocean 4 on for a few hours and come back to your living room on fire due to your xbox, (google that, it really happened) if microsoft werent such cheap bastards they could have avoided the whole issue in the first place, their marketing stand point was cut costs, ship product and hope  the early lead sustains us.

oh and as of august 2009 ign reports a 54.2 breakdown rate among its readers which is only a limited number, also the number has steadily increased if you do your research, heres a link to chew on. http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/101/1014486p1.html
« Last Edit: April 12, 2010, 05:45:49 am by Aricvomit »
Logged
plasma nade your face off!

TuX

  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #158 on: April 12, 2010, 11:08:30 am »

Yeah.... X-box and PS3.... I don't have any of these. So about the original topic.

Lately I was thinking about what really was not right in Fo3 and I came to a conlusion that it was in the quests. Their number to be more precise. I mean apart from the main story we have like 15 sidequests? Maybe less, don't know exactly. There is very little to do beside wander through the capital wasteland and find all those undiscovered locations and bobleheads or some other shit you might want to collect. In Oblivion for example we had some factions you could join and each faction had about 10 or so quests. There were also quests given by npc. I got the impression that the main quest was just an add-on, cause I was much more interested in rising my ranks in the Thieves or Assasin's Guild. I really do hope that Obsidian will see to that problem.
Logged

gordulan

  • General Animosity
  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #159 on: April 12, 2010, 12:01:21 pm »

or you could finish all the quests and go on a global killing spree with the indestructible Op:anchorage weapons & armour all thanks to Senõr gary.
Logged
 
http://tf-2.fr/ach.php?a=Bend Over, Boyo II&b=Shoot 150 people as they are running away from you... In the arse&c=56&d=150&e=1703&f=1
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #160 on: April 12, 2010, 04:40:37 pm »

lol at ps3 controller being better. They designed this


It got laughed out of existance annd they had to come up with something fast so they used the same crap controller they've been using since ps1 and tossed in sixaxis. It's tiny, not designed for human hand and is pretty much the worst thing you could ever play a shooter with. Who cares if it's better for street fighter? That game sucked in the 90's and it sucks now.
Logged
 

gordulan

  • General Animosity
  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #161 on: April 12, 2010, 04:54:47 pm »

well, it looks and feels sturdier than the wii remote, and besides, speaking of the wii, you could put an eye out with it
Logged
 
http://tf-2.fr/ach.php?a=Bend Over, Boyo II&b=Shoot 150 people as they are running away from you... In the arse&c=56&d=150&e=1703&f=1

Aricvomit

  • Prepare for bowel disruption
  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #162 on: April 12, 2010, 06:27:16 pm »

lol at ps3 controller being better. They designed this


It got laughed out of existance annd they had to come up with something fast so they used the same crap controller they've been using since ps1 and tossed in sixaxis. It's tiny, not designed for human hand and is pretty much the worst thing you could ever play a shooter with. Who cares if it's better for street fighter? That game sucked in the 90's and it sucks now.

its funny you use a concept image as your only argument and didnt dispute any of the other things i threw at you, i mean considering if this is your only argument its pretty stupid, honestly i dont like this controller, im glad they went back to the old one cause how can you improve upon perfection, and as for street fighter sucking, i guess its easy to say something sucks when your incapable of playing anything that requires reaction time when your functionally brain dead, right roachor?
Logged
plasma nade your face off!
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #163 on: April 12, 2010, 07:06:09 pm »

I just don't like simplistic games, 2d sidescroll button mashers aren't my thing. If you're going to play a fighting game at least pick something with some meat to it like DOA. Also the ps3 controller is for people with shrunken baby hands, my fingers cramp up when I used it and the levers that swing down/inward instead of clicking in are terrible. Sony can't design for shit, just look at all their peripherals like the usb headset that comes with a stupid dock on a wire. Ps2 was the biggest piece of garbage ever made and PS3 is just a glorified bluray player. I'm not saying the xbox is perfect but I wouldn't play the PS3 if it was free.

Also the new metal gear is on xbox and you guys get DLC about 6 months after we do, if ever.
*Free online = shit online.
*Ps2 controller being perfection is laughable
*Fanboys love defending garbage they bought because they paid for it.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2010, 07:18:12 pm by Roachor »
Logged
 

Surf

  • Moderator
  • это моё.
  • Offline
Re: New Vegas: shit or not shit?
« Reply #164 on: April 12, 2010, 07:09:51 pm »

So... Wasn't this thread about FO:NV?  ::)
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 15
 

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 19 queries.