http://fodev.net/forum/index.php?topic=3593.msg49860#msg49860
If that is true then
Why no one uses pancor in pvp(just look at hinkley)?
why this type of post still happening?
in all the games there is always the human factor, so statistics never are enough for predict the real events.
it makes me remember a lot of examples:
in COD MW2 the shotgun M1A1 was thinked as overpowered against the Stryker and in general against any other close weapon, some fan made tablesmeans that Stryker is overpowered against M1A1 due to the faster cadency (being a semiautomatic weapon) and the more damage, now no one uses the Stryker in MW2 and i mean NO ONE, if you want to beat a M1A1 you should simply dont get close, tables are wrong.
In Farcry2 the USAS-12 has the capacity of go trough human bodyes wich means that you can kill two guys in line with only 3 shots, people think it was overpowered in little maps, so they pull to take this out... it happen but in the next patch they reimplement that because guns like SAW or the MiniUzi were able to kill both guys in line in less time than the USAS-12 due to his insanely firerate.
In Halo Reach tables about DMR, Needler Rifle, Assault Rifle and Magnum have the same DPS at certain distance, reticule changes it at certain distances, but Magnum ALWAYS wins against the AR, and the Needler Rifle too.
In BFBC2 the M60 cant win against a G3, all the statistics of the M60 are lower than the G3, also the G3 have no inercy while faster moving and M60 has a insanely uncontrolable shooting shile moving faster... But no one use the G3 and people think that M60 is clearly overpowered, even being a more powerful weapon, also M60 is nerfed in PC versions, but G3 no.
And there are a lot of other examples...