Other > Off-topic discussions
OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD
Reiniat:
Life is too complied to talk about Ladem in a off-tpic in Fonline. come on just get fun, dont think about that, you can't change anything, we are to little and insignificant, EVERYONE IS. Even Obama or Osama (weeee word game) are little people.
I only admire Osama because he do something different... and he is now in the history, he will be remembered for long time, he is now inmortal.
But it doesnt matter, we cant change anything, why to be botter? it wont change what will happen or had happen.
Seriously off-topic is about Portal 2 or "Gears of Halo Theft Auto in the Postapocaliptic America" trolling not Osama Bin Ladem's dead
Michaelh139:
--- Quote from: Reiniat on May 04, 2011, 04:36:28 am ---Life is too complied to talk about Ladem in a off-tpic in Fonline. come on just get fun, dont think about that, you can't change anything, we are to little and insignificant, EVERYONE IS. Even Obama or Osama (weeee word game) are little people.
I only admire Osama because he do something different... and he is now in the history, he will be remembered for long time, he is now inmortal.
But it doesnt matter, we cant change anything, why to be botter? it wont change what will happen or had happen.
Seriously off-topic is about Portal 2 or "Gears of Halo Theft Auto in the Postapocaliptic America" trolling not Osama Bin Ladem's dead
--- End quote ---
Listen to this poster... please
Kilgore:
--- Quote from: Reiniat on May 04, 2011, 04:36:28 am ---Life is too complied to talk about Ladem in a off-tpic in Fonline. come on just get fun, dont think about that, you can't change anything, we are to little and insignificant, EVERYONE IS. Even Obama or Osama (weeee word game) are little people.
I only admire Osama because he do something different... and he is now in the history, he will be remembered for long time, he is now inmortal.
But it doesnt matter, we cant change anything, why to be botter? it wont change what will happen or had happen.
Seriously off-topic is about Portal 2 or "Gears of Halo Theft Auto in the Postapocaliptic America" trolling not Osama Bin Ladem's dead
--- End quote ---
Absolutely no one is forcing you to read/think/write about that.
Nice_Boat:
--- Quote from: Y0ssarian on May 04, 2011, 01:47:51 am ---lol forums lol Poland lol horses agianst tanks lol.
--- End quote ---
That's Soviet propaganda, never happened in reality.
--- Quote from: Y0ssarian on May 04, 2011, 01:47:51 am ---Lol military using DU munitions on already powerful 125mm MBT and 30mm autocannon that-are-already-effective-at-penetrating-armor rounds.
--- End quote ---
Let's see...
Leopard 2A6 turret front: 940mm RHA
T80U turret front: 850mm RHA
M1A2 SEP turret front: 960mm RHA
T72B with K-1 ERA turret front: 550mm RHA
T72M turret front: 380mm RHA
T55 turret front: 220mm RHA
M2A2/A3 Bradley turret front: 110mm RHA
BMP-1 turret front: 23mm RHA
US M829A3 120mm DU tank cannon round fired from Rheinmetal L-44 cannon: approx. 765mm at 2km
US M829A2 120mm DU tank cannon round fired from Rheinmetal L-44 cannon: approx. 730mm at 2km
German 120mm DM-33 Tungsten tank cannon round fired from Rheinmetal L-44 cannon: approx. 550mm at 2km
just for kicks and giggles:
25mm M919 APFSDS DU autocannon round 30mm+ at 60 degrees at 2km
25mm M791 APDS Tungsten autocannon round 33mm at 60 degrees at 1km; 28mm at 60 degrees at 2km
... yeah, let's totally defang our militaries so that their tank cannons barely defeat a 30 year old Soviet tank's front armor in the name of some obscure health risks that may or may not be involved in using the superior DU ammunition. And no, autocannons are not capable of defeating modern IFVs with front turret hits and barely manage to defeat obsolete BMP-1s. And yes, turret front is the most relevant section of armor when making comparisons because vehicles tend to be fighting from hull-down positions whenever feasible. Try trolling harder next time.
Y0ssarian:
Lol? Where did you get that information? Wikipedia? Lol. Can I get some actual names of people or books, references ect.? Where do you find such interesting information? Citations, bro?
Also any smart tank commander (assuming they are unfortunate enough to be the proud owner of horrible Soviet armor) will not,
for one, order a hull down agianst superior tank/air forces. Until the late 80s most Soviet tanks did not have the hull down capability of it's NATO counterpart. Even at that the shitty slopped armor design was more or less an echo from past WW2 experiences when the Soviet prefered armor doctrine was basically "Lol outnumber spam kekekekek flank spam rush go" not suited to your "hull down" tactics where as an Abrams gunner can comfortabley load shells and fire at targets miles away accuractly while sipping Coffee.
Also what moron(s) are telling you these lies? I've seen with my own eyes some old Shilka being destroyed by AP .50 cal ammunition. They destroyed the AA vehicle. What more do you want? A dead crew? But I suppose someone like you cares little for life and wants the crew to suffer aswell. Just because DU is "superior" it warrants over human life? The families get to suffer too! Or even yet, you'd make an air vehicle go and destroy the AA with it's 30mm cannon and watch in disbelief as the rounds magically bounced off due to superior HULL DOWN TACTICS LOL? Amirite? That's what you're basically saying. You really know very little. I almost lol'd when you said 30mm autocannons couldn't even destroy a BMP-1. You're a funny guy. You'd make great comedian in America. ^_____________^
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version