Other > Off-topic discussions

how many fonline people believes in church

<< < (15/32) > >>

lehytek:

inb4 this post gets deleted, censorship much, mods?

Mayck:
I was in church about 3-4 times in my entire life. I'm atheist from liberal christian family (that means I was offered the freedom to choose), I like to say that I am an atheist with christian values  ;D


--- Quote from: Colombo on April 10, 2011, 10:28:38 pm ---It is not beyond our understanding. It is fake. We have found no evidence for existence of soul, on the other side, we have quite a lot of evidence against it.

--- End quote ---
Evidence against existence of soul? Seriously WTH? Don't get me wrong, I personaly don't believe in some kind of spirit that leaves our dead body after we die. But seriously there is no way to prove it is not like that.


--- Quote from: lehytek on April 10, 2011, 10:36:50 pm ---image

--- End quote ---
It seems to me that many people mistake religion with faith, but those are 2 different things. Faith is something people believe in, something that gives them hope (it doesn't necesserily have to be a faith in god) and it doesn't have to go against science. Religion is set of rules that tells you how to live and what's good what's bad, the main flaw of the religion is that it can and it is heavily used just as tool to gain power, and this way it usually slows down progress. (So there should be written Religion in that picture :) )

Gorlak:
Educate yourselves...
http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2007/01/124778.pdf

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6056789081969524094#

lehytek:
What I don't like about christianity is that when christians get neck-deep in shit, they pray instead of trying to resolve their problems. Praying is not going to make the IRS return you your home. Praying is not going to return you neural capacity below the waist. This is called being lazy. Instead of getting disability welfare or a job, they will sit with a thumb stuck a foot deep in their ass and wait for a rain of 24k gold to fall on their head and solve their problems.

I could say some more smart things, but considering this is a hive of cannibal trolls, I'd be just wasting my time. VOTE FRED PHELPS FOR GM.

Colombo:
Mayack: yes, there are plenty of them, thermodynamic law eg.

You modern theories are quite consistent, IF there would be ghost, it would have to react with body somehow etc. it would mean mutch more new things, and that our contenporary knowledge is wrong. It could be, but because quite consistency in our theories and no strong prove that they are wrong (eg. no evidence for ghost etc.), this is evidence against ghost. Theory with spirits should explain our conteporary knowledge consistently with new spirits evidence. But hypothesis with spirits don't do that, they try to explain only spirits and try to relativize all our knowledge. Because no real scientist even think of them.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page