Other > General Game Discussion
Critical hits
vedaras:
--- Quote from: kiki123 on March 20, 2011, 03:29:34 PM ---
but i was not talking about the money situation i was talking about PVP chrs...
--- End quote ---
Dude, its not that hard to reason and understand that if you have stuff in game that cost for example 10 times the amount of some other stuff, it should be better in battles of that game. Before what we had? 1) More expensive stuff was better. 2) Now cheaper is. So personally you, which of these 2 situations do you find more right? Current situation is completely wrong. You want to talk about pvp chars, but actually they almost didint change at all, only the weapon statistics did, which led to current situation.
kiki123:
--- Quote from: vedaras on March 20, 2011, 07:18:57 PM ---Dude, its not that hard to reason and understand that if you have stuff in game that cost for example 10 times the amount of some other stuff, it should be better in battles of that game. Before what we had? 1) More expensive stuff was better. 2) Now cheaper is. So personally you, which of these 2 situations do you find more right? Current situation is completely wrong. You want to talk about pvp chars, but actually they almost didint change at all, only the weapon statistics did, which led to current situation.
--- End quote ---
lmfao weapon stats changed that is the whole point of my conversation not money not characters but weapons and crits.
avv:
--- Quote from: vedaras on March 20, 2011, 07:18:57 PM ---Dude, its not that hard to reason and understand that if you have stuff in game that cost for example 10 times the amount of some other stuff, it should be better in battles of that game. Before what we had? 1) More expensive stuff was better. 2) Now cheaper is. So personally you, which of these 2 situations do you find more right? Current situation is completely wrong. You want to talk about pvp chars, but actually they almost didint change at all, only the weapon statistics did, which led to current situation.
--- End quote ---
If expensive weapons equal automatic superiority in pvp, we're going to have less pvp because many players don't want to participate because they can't afford it.
vedaras:
--- Quote from: avv on March 20, 2011, 07:57:54 PM ---If expensive weapons equal automatic superiority in pvp, we're going to have less pvp because many players don't want to participate because they can't afford it.
--- End quote ---
Dont take it so plain. If we compare avenger 10k price + 500 burst price with sniper rifle 5k price with 12 caps shot price, then i would think of situation being balanced if avenger would have 60-65% to win and 35-40% to lose. Now avenger has even bigger chance to lose this is completely wrong :> And talking about economic situation i dont remember any session where players could not afford something :>
kiki123:
--- Quote from: vedaras on March 20, 2011, 08:17:20 PM ---Dont take it so plain. If we compare avenger 10k price + 500 burst price with sniper rifle 5k price with 12 caps shot price, then i would think of situation being balanced if avenger would have 60-65% to win and 35-40% to lose. Now avenger has even bigger chance to lose this is completely wrong :> And talking about economic situation i dont remember any session where players could not afford something :>
--- End quote ---
You do have a point there vederas....
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version