fodev.net
Other => FOnline:2238 Forum => Archives => Suggestions => Topic started by: Ed Wood on February 12, 2013, 10:01:08 pm
-
I think its already painfull the drug crafting in this session it would be nice if we atlast managed to make them faster not 1 by 1
10 stacks should do the trick in my opinion!
-
+1. Same might be for Stimpaks and SS, 10 instead of 1. Or at least some option where you can decide the amount. For example, you're going to craft 3 Super Stimpaks: so, you'll need 3 Empty Hypodermic, 6 Bio Med Gel and 9 Chem. Components.
Basically, you can choose how many of them you want to craft at the same time, you will be able to choose from 1 to 3 in this case, since 1 Super Stimpack requires 1 Empty Hypodermic, 1 Bio Med Gel and 1 Chem Component. Actually because it's a pointless waste of time press "F", select "Item", then "Fix" and repeat it tons of time, when it's for the same item.
-
Sorry if i was not accurate i ment on all the items that is made by doctor prof. even the week healing powders. My maus is already at hes end and when i was making 300 radaways ohhh god save the queen next time im sure i put a bullet in my head before that!
-
New blueprints could be added to allow this.
-
+1
fixboy interface generally needs an overhaul.
-
I think its already painfull the drug crafting in this session it would be nice if we atlast managed to make them faster not 1 by 1
10 stacks should do the trick in my opinion!
+1
fixboy interface generally needs an overhaul.
It will (https://i.imgur.com/0UmZkiJ.png).
-
Good lord this looks good!
-
The new buttons does not look Falloutish. But modders will surely manage to something about that. Thank you and please focus on the funkcionality before the look.
-
I still like my version (https://i.imgur.com/fLE9QQx.png) more... Bah, im a coder without art school; it's others who will take care of look once code is done :P
-
Great to hear that something actually seems to be in progress with remaking FixBoy to handle X amount of items. And the graphic looks fine, not that that matters, I'd settle for your second picture if it meant it is implemented faster.