fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • November 17, 2024, 12:43:39 am
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Better Big Guns at hinkley  (Read 4899 times)

Surf

  • Moderator
  • это моё.
  • Offline
Re: Better Big Guns at hinkley
« Reply #30 on: October 07, 2010, 04:37:56 pm »

What has this to do with maturity?

Cha

  • Lawyer for Great Justice.
    • TTTLA FORUM
  • Offline
Re: Better Big Guns at hinkley
« Reply #31 on: October 07, 2010, 04:40:17 pm »

I just CANT understand why no avenger in Hinkley... since they are absolutely part of the rest of the game and weaker today than ever...

Saying Avengers will dominate everything in Hinkley its just wrong.... since they just not dominate pvp...

Lordus

  • So long and THANKS for all the fish!
  • Offline
Re: Better Big Guns at hinkley
« Reply #32 on: October 07, 2010, 05:20:54 pm »

I just CANT understand why no avenger in Hinkley... since they are absolutely part of the rest of the game and weaker today than ever...

Saying Avengers will dominate everything in Hinkley its just wrong.... since they just not dominate pvp...

 I THINK that it will cause other bursting gun obsolete.
 But ok, maybe i made mistake. We can test it in Hinkley, if it will cause obsolete rest of bursting weapons.
Logged
So long and THANKS for all the fish!
Re: Better Big Guns at hinkley
« Reply #33 on: October 07, 2010, 07:48:15 pm »

Quote
I THINK that it will cause other bursting gun obsolete.

so why aren't they obsolete in the whole game already ?

i just cant understant this fear that avenger will kick all other guns.

In most TC I did, I see there is only 1 avenger for every 10 people almost. tell me why if it is so clear that it's the "best-gun-that-kill-PvP-balance"?

i think avenger is obsolete today, try it.
Even my nodrugs leader build with rocket lancher and 50PV less is better !

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 

Page created in 0.859 seconds with 21 queries.