Other > Off-topic discussions

fallout 1 ,2 or 3 which is your favourite

<< < (6/7) > >>

RavenousRat:

--- Quote from: gordulan on August 12, 2010, 08:57:26 pm ---then try arcanum too, it's badass beyond words

--- End quote ---
Arcanum... playable only in real time mod without using magic and guns, because it's imba. Also it's not interesting to kill everything on sight with a dagger in TB only because you have 50 APs and backstab skill on max.
Arcanum more looks like not serious fan-made game, because there totally no balance and adequate game play, but still this is cool game because of atmoshpere and if you simply don't use overpowered features and turn based combat. Btw this is offtop.

Surf:
Fallout 1. It was balanced, the world was believable. It was dark, gritty, without stupid Fallout 2 humour. The graphics were better (what the fuck did they thought making those ugly critters in FO2?). It was much more believable. It wasn't too long (FO2 is way too long). It displayed the best view of a postapocalyptical world in a game so far for me.

Fallout 2 had it's moments (the earlier towns, Klamath, Modoc, Den were good) but the rest... ugh.

Let's not even talk about "Fallout" 3, it is no Fallout, it shouldn't even be allowed to talk about that piece of shit.

gordulan:

--- Quote from: Surf Solar on August 13, 2010, 09:28:41 am ---Let's not even talk about "Fallout" 3, it is no Fallout, it shouldn't even be allowed to talk about that piece of shit.

--- End quote ---

can't agree with you on that, I mean, it was a bit over the top with the cultural references, and bethsoft utterly failed with their quality control leaving the game filled to the brim with bugs*

and was far too easy, and the plot was beyond simplistic, but it was a fallout nontheless, despite its many shortcomings* it was in a wasteland, although it felt as though the world suffered from nuclear winter and dislocated FEV*...

*Refer to picture

Surf:
I am not even talking about the games mechanics (no words needed there). I am talking about the general artistic view of the game (check: it's nothing fallouty) the music (check: not fallouty) the general atmosphere/the world itself (check: not fallouty/totally overdone) the people "living" in this world (not even believable), the story mimikry ("hey, let's rip some ideas from previous Fallout games apart, let's mix them together and make them teh awzum") the "humor" and so on, and so on...  ::)

I mean, it's not even that hard to see that "Fallout" 3 has nothing to do with the true Fallout Titles.

corosive:
well fallout 3 did suck to every fallout 1 and 2 fan out there, but apparently the guys that made fallout 1-2 really liked fallout 3.... you guys all read http://www.nma-fallout.com atleast once a week right?

I will have to give bethesda credit for atleast making a fun sandbox fallout post apocalyptic game... once modded and turned into a FPS with rpg elements to it then its alright...

I think by the end of the year this post will be called "fallout 1,2, or NV which is your favourite" after New Vegas comes out made by the original fallout crew... should be pretty good but EXPECT FALLOUT 3 with a few tweaks and better dialogue.


Oh btw, my fav is fallout 2 - fallout 1 is a much darker story and experience but once you've played it every possible way since 1997 its just a big ol never ending story in your head. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page