Other > Suggestions
Make nonhostile encounters skippable with any outdoorsman.
Michaelh139:
Seriously, there is no point or logic behind being forced into a nonhostile encounter except to waste time :-/.
I can understand Raiders but when you get forced into VC caravans or NCR over and over it just gets kinda ridiculous :P.
(That is if your neutral or better with them only)
John.Metzger:
less outdoorsmen means the risk of spending time in random places while you are moving on worldmap.
whether they are hostile or not.
while you are in that encounter everybody is able to meet you.
a big part of this game. you are not able to avoid that. its ok.
Archaeon_dude:
YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS. His point is, like, TOTALLY valid. I know Broken Hills humans hate me, so encounters with them should pull an outdoorsman check on my face. Yet those ol' innocuous encounters should be skippable. It's realistic. You're walking around the desert and you see one of those monks jerking off. You say "Ah, it's just a dude... I'll leave him be". OFC, these "innocuous" encounters offer a possibility to another player to arrive and maybe do some massacrin'. Who would want THAT? I wouldn't. Skipping the encounter is the same thing as passing beside them NPCs without even sayin' "Hi".
There is a chance that in this innocuous looking encounter you end up in one of those secret cavel maps, with the bunch of neat stuff. We'll just assume that people skipping the encounter are aware of this.
Enzo:
--- Quote from: Archaeon_dude on July 06, 2010, 08:56:42 PM --- You're walking around the desert and you see one of those monks jerking off. You say "Ah, it's just a dude... I'll leave him be".
--- End quote ---
Your missing an important point... you have to see him to avoid meeting with him... maybe you didnt, so you just ran into him... bazinga... ;)
Archaeon_dude:
Fuck you, man! You're too right!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version