FOnline Development > General Discussion

Source code conspiracy

<< < (3/6) > >>

JovankaB:

--- Quote from: adumbperson on August 24, 2014, 02:13:06 am ---guyz stop turning around ....

All clients in the wild have version like this 0XXX-XX,
the TLA SDK by CVET is distribued with version like this 0XXX...

No fonline(2238,FO2,TLA) in the wild are working on the true TLA SDK furnished by CVET on xp-dev.com... EVEN TLA(fonline.ru) himself which work on a version 0XXX-XX...

so stop your lies... It's not same binaries like everyone else...

--- End quote ---

The version format was changed 2 months ago in revision 429 of FOnline SDK.
Before it was 0XXX-XX, now it's simply a revision number. It's even mentioned
in the commit message:


--- Quote ---Переделано обозначение версий сервера, клиента и маппера, теперь оно будет обозначать номер ревизии сдк.
--- End quote ---

The servers you listed use older revisions of FOnline SDK, that's why they
have a version like this 0XXX-XX.

You can easily check it by downgrading your copy of FOnline SDK to rev-428.
You will get, according to you, "better" binaries with version 0XXX-XX.

lisac2k:

--- Quote from: adumbperson on August 21, 2014, 10:13:58 am ---They have the sources... I mean jovankaB and Wipe... It's why fonline2 client is better than others (hotkeys.ini, ecetera...), their client isn't the same than the SDK TLA...
How about unequality un developpement stream?

I think this website is made more for fill their heads of ideas and keep their closed variant of fonline sdk living...

AoP is using an old version of fonline2...

Impressed no one noticed this shit before...

nothing more...

--- End quote ---
Whoa whoa youngster, now hold your horses! This kind of attitude won't get you anywhere.
If you have anything to share with the people around here, please do, but in a civilised, more articulate way.
We are working with facts only, and even if you do have some which you want to use as arguments, it's not polite to jump behind people's neck and stick those arguments into their eye-sockets.
Last but not least, leave insinuations for less serious places, there's a whole lotta them on the netz. Not sure about something? Feel free to ask.



--- Quote from: devis on August 21, 2014, 04:30:06 pm ---adumbperson

--- End quote ---
Please do restrain yourself from non-contributing mysterious one-liners, this is - and I am absolutely sure about it - completely wrong place for such expressions; thank you in advance, love, peace ;D

adumbperson:
Between russian language, uncompilable doc, unclear developpement, bugs, ecetera... I prefer pass my turn and waste my precious time on others thingies...

Thx for replies, i'm off for now no point to stick in this forum, good luck everybody.

JovankaB:

--- Quote from: adumbperson on August 24, 2014, 11:51:22 pm ---Between russian language, uncompilable doc, unclear developpement, bugs, ecetera... I prefer pass my turn and waste my precious time on others thingies...

Thx for replies, i'm off for now no point to stick in this forum, good luck everybody.

--- End quote ---

Good luck and if you find something strange in the other thingies too,
my advice is to simply ask about it instead of calling people liars.

adumbperson:
according to what messages i posted on that thread ...

JovankaB was saying : http://fodev.net/forum/index.php/topic,29631.msg259907.html#msg259907

about version 428 i'll be abble to get version 0428-XX...

but how the client of fo2 (Starting FOnline (version 0438-F8)...) and AoP (Starting FOnline (version 0436-F7)...) get this version if it ended in rev 428 ...

I'm curious now what you'll found to tell i'm in wrong way :D...

where i can find its version of fonline sdk? ;)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version