fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • April 08, 2025, 10:23:00 pm
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  • Print

Author Topic: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.  (Read 10950 times)

Roachor

  • Offline
Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« on: October 03, 2012, 09:00:52 pm »
Just look at vietnam. Viet cong (dudes in pyjamas) using stealth and deadly hth combat defeated the arrogant, better equipped americans (pvp apes). So yeah, stealth and tactics has its place in combat.
Logged
 

Enzotainment

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2012, 10:10:13 pm »
Are you saying jungle tactics work just as well in a desolate, post apocalyptic desert?
Logged

Crovax

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2012, 10:12:36 pm »
Melee was way cooler when u needed armor and some kind of fist weapon/Super Sledge.
Logged
"I am condemned without end." -Crovax

Roachor

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2012, 10:53:12 pm »
Quote from: Enzotainment on October 03, 2012, 10:10:13 pm
Are you saying jungle tactics work just as well in a desolate, post apocalyptic desert?

Im saying that guerrilla tactics will allow you to overcome more powerful enemies, most combat is in urban areas anyways. California isn't all desert buddy.
Logged
 

Enumi

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2012, 11:05:27 pm »
Quote from: Roachor on October 03, 2012, 09:00:52 pm
Just look at vietnam. Viet cong (dudes in pyjamas) using stealth and deadly hth combat defeated the arrogant, better equipped americans (pvp apes). So yeah, stealth and tactics has its place in combat.

Dude you really should stop watching some kinds of films and should get back into reallity
Logged

Roachor

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2012, 11:43:40 pm »
Quote from: Enumi on October 03, 2012, 11:05:27 pm
Dude you really should stop watching some kinds of films and should get back into reallity

Oh are you from an alternate universe where the americans won?
Logged
 

Mayck

  • Rotator
  • ...shhhh...
  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2012, 11:50:45 pm »
Quote from: Roachor on October 03, 2012, 11:43:40 pm
Oh are you from an alternate universe where the americans won?
No, but they had much lower losses.
Logged

chocolate_chip_cookies

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2012, 12:45:48 am »
Lol I can't recall the viet cong fighting with their fists
Logged

Slaver Snipe

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2012, 01:16:27 am »
Apparently the viet cong were all lvl 27 monks.
Logged

Fettel

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2012, 01:20:19 am »
Welcome to jungle..
Logged
We’ve died a million times but we are not the walking dead

Fat Man

  • Guest
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2012, 01:52:13 am »
I think you really need to understand vietnam before you make the stupid assumption the big bad super power USA lost to vietnamese farmers.

The U.S. also had a higher kill ratio, the Americans killed 10 vietcong to every 1 American soldier. Also the war ended not because "they won" but becuase it had very unpopular support amongst the American people so the politicians decided to leave or "pull out". Vietnam was a strange war it was not a war to take terroritory, the Americans got into that war becuase an American base got bombed which was an act of war, and we were originally just there to support the south vietnamese becuase they were going to get overthrown by communist north vietnamese which were killing anybody including woman and children in south vietnam.

So your logic is false and somehow I think this is an arguement so you can keep playing your blue suit trolls without farming and crafting powerfist.

But anyways glad this stupid cold war crap and communist fear is over. Now we can all play fonline together.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2012, 01:55:13 am by Fat Man »
Logged

Roachor

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2012, 01:54:36 am »
bluesuits have high casualties but we wear you down till you leave, also we pop out of underground tunnels
Logged
 

Fat Man

  • Guest
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2012, 01:59:39 am »
Quote from: Roachor on October 04, 2012, 01:54:36 am
bluesuits have high casualties but we wear you down till you leave, also we pop out of underground tunnels

Very nice anology.
Logged

falloutdude

  • just some canadian guy
  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2012, 02:13:38 am »
roacher stop trying to justify your reasons for being a troll and why your alt trolls should not be changed. you know they are OP for bluesuits and they need to change. get over it.
Logged
Roaming the waste again.

McLooter

  • Offline
Re: Reasons why a man in pyjamas can beat a man in combat armour with a minigun.
« Reply #14 on: October 04, 2012, 04:19:45 am »
I agree, Melee/Unarmed was way more fun the previous way. Now it may be fun, but it just ruins the game, remove this crap ffs.
Logged
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
 

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 21 queries.