Other > Suggestions
Give players the ability to change the build of an already leveled character.
chocolate_chip_cookies:
I'm hesitant about the idea for a couple reasons.
Imagine there is a crafting character and he's harmless at actually fighting. And then one day he changes into a big bad PvP character.
There's just something not right about that.
Also, there's the problem with using alt after alt to attack. And someone could just change all their alts to PvP characters just for the fight.
And there is always a problem with making something expensive. It will be available by the wrong people. As in who is the richest? Big factions.
Michaelh139:
--- Quote from: chocolate_chip_cookies on February 19, 2012, 05:03:40 AM ---Imagine there is a crafting character and he's harmless at actually fighting. And then one day he changes into a big bad PvP character.
There's just something not right about that.
--- End quote ---
I suppose it can feel pretty odd.
But for a beta it has a lot of uses.
As well as that, I suppose there can be a small degradation to it.
"During the process, you lose some memories"
effect: You lose 3 levels. (if you did it at 24, you are now level 21)
--- Quote ---Also, there's the problem with using alt after alt to attack. And someone could just change all their alts to PvP characters just for the fight.
--- End quote ---
It's harder to make a crafter level 24 than a pvp char to level 24. So what's the big deal?
--- Quote --- And there is always a problem with making something expensive. It will be available by the wrong people. As in who is the richest? Big factions.
--- End quote ---
I'm saying bring to to the middle. The Big factions will always be the richest, baddest, fucking ass holes in the wastes.
But make it at least a challenge for smaller gangs, and an extreme one for loners.
say, 50,000 caps for one level change.
Loners will have trouble, but that's part of being a loner.
small gangs will have to work for it, but it's hardly out of their reach.
Big factions -
--- Quote ---The Big factions will always be the richest, baddest, fucking ass holes in the wastes.
--- End quote ---
Cloudwolfe:
--- Quote from: Jawebo on February 19, 2012, 04:49:43 AM ---YES..YOZZ..I AM TOTALLY AGAINST THIS NEW WAY OF CHEATING...THE LAST THING PLAYERS LIKE YOU NEED! Already your biggest **** in the game, watching a fight and getting that last kill on people...PKING is one thing, but you bring a new low to the game!!!
--- End quote ---
Players taking advantage of others in a game of survival of the fittest. What?!
Anyway, I would be against this because leveling and the involvement of activities while leveling is still content that needs to be tested. If the suggested was the case then most of the player testing would be done at max level with the in-between start to finish being left out.
Perhaps all the required testing of leveling has already been fulfilled, perhaps not. We just don't know.
Michaelh139:
People still need to level first, it's not like insta-level up or anything.
Also, Hardly anyone's going to ONLY PLAY ONE CHAR.
You still would have to pay a butt-load of caps to change the stats, and if my add-on of -3 levels got added they'd have to re-level to achieve max a little bit, so there's a little bit of constant levelling included.
Cloudwolfe:
--- Quote from: Michaelh139 on February 19, 2012, 06:45:51 AM ---People still need to level first, it's not like insta-level up or anything.
Also, Hardly anyone's going to ONLY PLAY ONE CHAR.
You still would have to pay a butt-load of caps to change the stats, and if my add-on of -3 levels got added they'd have to re-level to achieve max a little bit, so there's a little bit of constant levelling included.
--- End quote ---
I never implied that people wouldn't have to level up first. However, if the system worked in a way that you couldn't change your special then it would be terrible and if the system worked in a way that you could change your special then there would be little point to leveling another character because you wouldn't have the need to, past what it would theoretically cost to do so of course.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version