Other > General Game Discussion
need a better fonline game
Frenchy:
Bring back old Town-Control system.
yoz:
--- Quote from: Solar on February 14, 2012, 09:32:07 PM ---We've just come through years (literally) of moaning about them, so no!
I think the amount spawned is actually reasonable, (I know it is - I see how much is being spawned) but its not being equally distributed, hence some people having trouble.
Like I say, perhaps cows and slaves being able to take so much is a problem, the same people are clearing the place out, or perhaps its just a case of needing to spawn less but more often to spread it out. Anyway, we'll get there you just have to adjust your expectations about the speed of progress to account for the fact that the people who are needed to change things can't always be active.
--- End quote ---
Not that I care about crafting, but if you like the total quantities and the distribution is the issue, why don't you lower the replenishment intervals and the replenished amount, while keeping the total daily replenished amount the same.
Swarm:
--- Quote from: Frenchy on February 14, 2012, 10:52:27 PM ---Bring back old Town-Control system.
--- End quote ---
^This, Veterans are quitting and frustrated also because of this new system. We want old TC PvP fights with the new perks outside of hinkly.
--- Quote from: Solar on February 14, 2012, 09:44:01 PM ---Good point, that's a lot harder to solve because we have no effective way of stopping them, outside of something like making carry weight gain less at higher strength (and I can hear the whine about nerfs now - listen to how much they whine even when everything is actually being relaxed/boosted!).
--- End quote ---
That's great to know that our suggestions for a fun game, and giving our opinions about new changes is whining. But besides the point. We want a fun game, we already know the game is frustrating and not easy and isn't suppose to be but some changes make us questions as to why they are done. For example I never understood 10mm SMG removal...
Maybe instead of nerfing carrying weight maybe give us the ability to science ammo? Some are successful getting materials in mines the alternative is science to this problem and if we could science ammo that would be great for gun powder and advanced gun powder. Just make stack of 20 or a stack of 50 for a chance to get 1 HQ gun powder or something. Maybe not the best idea but something along these lines would resolve resource hording the biggest issue for me is getting minerals and hq minerals for gun powders, ores, hq ores, alloys, and hq alloys is easy enough with science there is no need to go to mine for this stuff.
I mean really carebear the noobs... you mean I had to go through all this difficult shit to get to where I am at and now people suggest there should noob carebear stuff added...
I started noob this wipe with nothing and I built my way up with no exploits, so if there is noob carebear added stuff that is ridiculous to suggest or implement when things are changed to make things more difficult for veterans.
Solar:
Yoz, that is what I mean by more spread out.
avv:
--- Quote from: Solar on February 14, 2012, 09:44:01 PM ---Good point, that's a lot harder to solve because we have no effective way of stopping them, outside of something like making carry weight gain less at higher strength (and I can hear the whine about nerfs now - listen to how much they whine even when everything is actually being relaxed/boosted!).
--- End quote ---
You could simply set the same inventory room for all chars, regardless of str and perks. Carryweight is 90% support ability, pvp players want to cut it from their pvp alts and move it to dedicated cw alts. If it bothers someone that pvp chars could then carry 60 rockets, 100 superstims, tesla armor, BA, avenger, rocketlauncher, motion sensor, 4 sets of drugs and the stuff of his dead pal, so what? It's called risking.
Making chars more equal in terms of support abilities has plain zero negative effects on gameplay. Removing profesion limit was only beneficial and relieving to many players. Haven't heard any moaning about that at all.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version