Other > Suggestions
Tanks
Reiniat:
whats the point of give us many new awesome perks if we can just set 10end take 3 Lifegiver and be unkilleable?
Seiously tank builds are now more powerful than ever, and if any guy wants to make any combat build he need to take at least 2 Lifegiver.
Unless you are doctor or sneaker take 3 lifegiver is the best option.
Result is simple: In some months youll see any powerbuild using 3lifegiver, all the other perks doesnt give more advantages.
Wallace:
--- Quote from: Reiniat on January 12, 2012, 05:10:36 PM ---Result is simple: In some months youll see any powerbuild using 3lifegiver, all the other perks doesnt give more advantages.
--- End quote ---
Plenty of perks give more advantages than lifegivers. Simple as that...
Wichura:
--- Quote from: Reiniat on January 12, 2012, 05:10:36 PM ---Result is simple: In some months youll see any powerbuild using 3lifegiver, all the other perks doesnt give more advantages.
--- End quote ---
Ever heard of Toughness perk? Or anti-crit perks?
"3 Lifegver unkillable tank" my ass, sir.
Quentin Lang:
Yeah, I kinda agree that tanks are OP since recent events...
I did try one tank build, and while it was good, It didn't felt as good enough. Any suggestions for the build? The one I tried right now is this:
Weight 67.6 short tons (60.4 long tons; 61.3 t)
Length Gun forward: 32.04 ft (9.77 m)
Hull length: 26.02 ft (7.93 m)
Width 12 ft (3.66 m)
Height 8 ft (2.44 m)
Crew 4 (commander, gunner, loader, driver)
Main armament 105 mm L52 M68 rifled cannon (M1)
120 mm L44 M256 smoothbore cannon (M1A1, M1A2, M1A2SEP) with 42 rounds.
Secondary armament 1 x .50-caliber (12.7 mm) M2HB heavy machine gun with 900 rounds
2 x 7.62 mm (.308) M240 machine guns with 8,800 rounds (1 pintle-mounted, 1 coaxial).
It WAS pretty decent, but it felt somewhat lacking. The turn rate and carry weight wasn't just enough.
LagMaster:
--- Quote from: Quentin Lang on January 12, 2012, 08:42:54 PM ---Yeah, I kinda agree that tanks are OP since recent events...
I did try one tank build, and while it was good, It didn't felt as good enough. Any suggestions for the build? The one I tried right now is this:
Weight 67.6 short tons (60.4 long tons; 61.3 t)
Length Gun forward: 32.04 ft (9.77 m)
Hull length: 26.02 ft (7.93 m)
Width 12 ft (3.66 m)
Height 8 ft (2.44 m)
Crew 4 (commander, gunner, loader, driver)
Main armament 105 mm L52 M68 rifled cannon (M1)
120 mm L44 M256 smoothbore cannon (M1A1, M1A2, M1A2SEP) with 42 rounds.
Secondary armament 1 x .50-caliber (12.7 mm) M2HB heavy machine gun with 900 rounds
2 x 7.62 mm (.308) M240 machine guns with 8,800 rounds (1 pintle-mounted, 1 coaxial).
It WAS pretty decent, but it felt somewhat lacking. The turn rate and carry weight wasn't just enough.
--- End quote ---
i say it's a preety good build, probably will use it to aid some tribals in afganistan
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version