Other > News and Announcements
Revolutionizing Faction Terminal
Grommok:
Good to know. NOW i'm sure i'll love this new faction system! 8)
Now, for that one-headed brahmin... i'm still working on it.
Crazy:
Even if it seems "magical", in my experience, it would be easier to deal with base raper by just making the location disappear for them when they're removed from list. There is a very good argument for that: after wipe, you won't be able to have as many followers, and I am not even sure you could let them camp in your base while your sleep (which is a good thing, for everything but base protection). Gameplay>Realism
Lidae:
--- Quote ---Gameplay>Realism
--- End quote ---
Agreed!
I was thinking about name colorising, and I can sort of understand the argument against the old system in the sense of being "unrealistic"... But what if instead of being able to always see immediately what faction any player is in and have different colours for all of them, perhaps you would need permission from those factions first? Say maybe C88 can ask TTTLA (allies) to get automatic colorising for their members, so that all C88 will immediately recognise TTTLA, but if C88 were to ask, say, CS, perhaps they would deny this and C88 members would not be able to automatically spot CS members, but would have to add these manually to the database instead. This way you would be able to automatically keep track of those in factions that have given their consent, sort of like shared intelligence, but keeping track of those that want to remain "hidden" will have to be done much like before. I think this would be more realistic, and also more useful than the current name colorising. It would also be really nice if setting enemies of faction would allow all members of that base to see those nicks in red. It would lead to less friendly fire and less confusion, I think.
Bartosz:
--- Quote from: Lidae on August 14, 2011, 08:28:51 pm ---Say maybe C88 can ask TTTLA (allies) to get automatic colorising for their members, so that all C88 will immediately recognise TTTLA, but if C88 were to ask, say, CS, perhaps they would deny this and C88 members would not be able to automatically spot CS members, but would have to add these manually to the database instead.
--- End quote ---
I think we may indeed build something like that on top of those databases - once we get everything up and running - and without much hassle. I'm optimistic:)
Reiniat:
--- Quote ---The other case however, might also be liked (oh no, he may come and kill us in our base, better quickly revoke his access!!!), but I very much liked the fact you needed to kill that unwanted player on your own ground to settle things, so I could think of solution for this, if it is really needed.
--- End quote ---
If we end up doing everything via computer inside another computer, its like be ourselves inside of Fonline: staying everyday looking to our PC instead of enjoy the beautiful wasteland. There must be limits to what you can do via faction terminal. :P
About accounts for each player.....WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE. i really wait for something like that since i begin to play this game, in my very own opinion players should be able to know who is the REAL user of all those ugly alts that ride around. Sounds unrealistic and most people will not want it but its a good idea since the whole alt system is unrealistic.
You should not change characters and be a completely different player since all your characters serve one master, sounds hipocrit at least to me.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version