fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • November 17, 2024, 03:39:59 pm
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: "Domination Mode" and "Faction Scenarios"  (Read 6539 times)

avv

  • Offline
Re: "Domination Mode" and "Faction Scenarios"
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2011, 01:41:35 pm »

It would be part of the map itself and the team who won that particular domination battle would have access to it, until it was fought over again.

The facility itself would be one of the places you could build tier 2 or 3 stuff, depending on exactly how good a facility it was.

So only the ones who participated the fight... interesting. There's no way to lead other players there by tagging?
Logged
Based on evidence collected from various sources by trustworthy attendees it is undisputed veritability that the land ravaged by atomic warfare which caused extreme change of the ecosystem and environmental hazards can be considered unpleasant, rugged and unforgiving.

Crazy

  • Drugged Childkiller
  • Offline
Re: "Domination Mode" and "Faction Scenarios"
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2011, 01:42:42 pm »

Quote
For domination mode? They NPC faction will only be hiring, so there won't be a need to be in any gang or faction. If a group of solo players wanted to get together and play I believe they could.

For faction scenarios - I hope player gangs could ally with NPC factions and essentially be counted as members without really joining - but I'm not sure how high up the list that is ... there's plenty of work just getting the NPC factions up and working yet anyway.

Great, thanks for answer.

Damn, all of this sound so good... Can't wait to have it ;p
Logged
When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk

Member of the Most Hated Faction
TTTLA, for Great Justice !

Solar

  • Rotator
  • Offline
Re: "Domination Mode" and "Faction Scenarios"
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2011, 01:50:20 pm »

So only the ones who participated the fight... interesting. There's no way to lead other players there by tagging?

Ideally you'd want it to be only the people who were there, but I'm not sure if tagging has (or will be) been made impossible or not.
Logged
Quote from: Woodrow Wilson
If you want to make enemies, try to change something.
Re: "Domination Mode" and "Faction Scenarios"
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2011, 04:14:44 pm »

It sounds intresting and i will surely participate  :)

But personally i would prefere the TC to be worked on, more people on one side is a tactic on its own. Adding scenarios to TC towns maybe would be a good idea too :P
Logged

Solar

  • Rotator
  • Offline
Re: "Domination Mode" and "Faction Scenarios"
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2011, 06:32:32 pm »

Seems like TC's natural direction is to be more long term control of a town, with more added to do in it ... at least that seems to be what players suggest most for it.
Logged
Quote from: Woodrow Wilson
If you want to make enemies, try to change something.
Re: "Domination Mode" and "Faction Scenarios"
« Reply #20 on: June 17, 2011, 04:11:09 pm »

Finally got an answer about this domination stuff... ::)

Thanks for asking Eternauta, even if it was long ago.

I have a few questions, if i may.

- These factions scenarios would be permanent, or only at selected time. (more like event, or more like hinkley)
- The NPC factions would always hire their own npcs to cooperate with players ?
- Would be some PVE only scenario ? (Basically, one faction playing agains't an equally numbered and skilled group of npc)

Logged

Solar

  • Rotator
  • Offline
Re: "Domination Mode" and "Faction Scenarios"
« Reply #21 on: June 17, 2011, 04:24:04 pm »

- Like an event, just occuring at pre determined times, periodically.
- If it needs them to equal out teams, yup
- Thats possible, yes.

We really should have a contest to find some mapper to just make loads of PvP maps
Logged
Quote from: Woodrow Wilson
If you want to make enemies, try to change something.
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Page created in 0.112 seconds with 22 queries.