Other > Off-topic discussions
OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD
Jescri:
To go back on the topic, I think the OBL's death will not resolve the terrorist actions. I think that terrorists actions will be more violent in USA ... why ? Because USA killed one of the terrorist leader, their icon, and now they are celebrating OBL death as the best new of the century without any modesty.
It would be like Terrorist killed Obama, and they were making a great party to celebrate it. I think that USA would air strike all of them, and send all the terrorists family in jail, or in Guantanamo.
So now, terrorist have even more "good" reasons for making attacks.
(and damn, why have them killed him ? I wanted to capture him later to have the gift and be rich ! 8))
Slaver Snipe:
You just want to be okay without making other countries suffer? How about defaulting on a massive debt and being saved by the IMF, oh and don't forget the US, which has the most "pull" in the IMF voted to help your country. Guess you DO forget about the good things the US does, when it was YOUR countries fuck up that brought that about. Yes, i read your post it doesn't explain why you dislike us calling ourselves American when it's been going on for more than 200 years, It has nothing to do with us "thinking" we own North and South America or trying to act like we do, you need to learn that child. About your previous posts about all south American countries just want to form strong bonds with each other etc. I doubt colombia or the other nations that receive massive foreign aid from us would agree.
First you bring up Guantanamo then China, two completely different situations please read some more then post a relevant reply.
Of course your country isn't as hated "all" over the world, you are very small on the world stage thus your fuck ups are not put into a spotlight like ours are.
Yes, seems like terrorism doesn't happen in your country.
https://www.privacyinternational.org/article/terrorism-profile-argentina
I would have to say if that could have been avoided by the torture of one person your leader at the time would have done it.
Now with that information if i wanted to be like you and generalize all Argentinians i could say that your terrorist supporting debt defaulting assholes who forget the good of others. Fair? I guess so if you can generalize Americans as you do.
At OP, do you know how many prisoners have even been in Guantanamo? Families of terrorists do not go there.
At BP, Off-topic discussions, perhaps that means not related to game perhaps it means de-railing threads.
Lizard:
@Eternauta, SlaverSnipe
GTFO my OBL topic with your offtop shitstorm and whatnot. Both of you.
Lacan:
I'm saddened by one thing : our lilberties have been restricted for 10 years to fight terrorism, and now that the symbol of terrorism is dead, the first thing government (in france at least) does is "enforce more rules and security because there might be revenge actions"... So still less rights to move around as you please, dress as you like, carry what you want, talk to people you want, have religion you want... When is this gonna end ? I want to be able to cary shampoo when i take plane (just an example :)) !
Y0ssarian:
--- Quote from: Nice_Boat on May 04, 2011, 07:38:48 pm ---Tanknet and Jane's Defence Guide. Feasible enough?
--- End quote ---
Citations, bro? Source? Hardly feasible.
--- Quote from: Nice_Boat on May 04, 2011, 07:38:48 pm ---All tanks have hull down capability, it's situational and depends on the terrain and the presence of fortifications. Sloped armor is not a "shitty design" and is still being widely used as it increases relative armor thickness and increases the probability of a ricochet.
--- End quote ---
If you believe a 120mm round cannot penetrate soviet armor at any slope, angle or distance... well, you might as well spend that excess penetration power by lining up 2 T90s and calling it a day. Metamorphically speaking without any patriotic fanaticism... a very large knife through butter. Balls down (lol) or not. Shitty slopped design, shitty soviet armor. Couldn't prove me wrong otherwise even twisting my words. Care to quote? But anyways in regard to DU ammunition, it's pretty much overkill. Literally. But we're going on a tangent from this initial thread's nature and I no longer wish to discuss with a fail troll that had the nerve to ask for "citations" while giving out wikipedia links. Major dead giveaway. At the university level (lol forums), using wikipedia = perma ban from campus. Troll harder, kid, troll harder.
--- Quote from: Nice_Boat on May 04, 2011, 07:38:48 pm ---A Shilka has weaker armor than a BMP. Actually, a BMP can feasibly be destroyed by .50 cal as well, just not from the front.
--- End quote ---
I can be an anal retentive douchebag, too! Look, this would make be right about two things. Contradicting what you wrote earlier. Fail!
--- Quote from: Nice_Boat on May 04, 2011, 01:48:05 pm ---That's Soviet propaganda, never happened in reality.
--- End quote ---
Author of "The Tin Drum" would say otherwise. Polish soldiers mounting horses agianst tanks. Although being a novel of very satire nature... might as well be a comic fallacy over truth.
--- Quote from: Nice_Boat on May 04, 2011, 01:48:05 pm ---... yeah, let's totally defang our militaries so that their tank cannons barely defeat a 30 year old Soviet tank's front armor
--- End quote ---
Whatever the hell you're smoking please share!. Opting out from DU munitions would hardly "defang" our militaries, but Poland already does pretty good job of that on it's own accord. =}
P.S I take back everything I said about shitty Soviet tank designs with shitty slopped armor. They are wonderful. Soviet tanks were causing more harm to the crews than any enemy ever could. I never seen such a lackluster effort in protecting tank crews. How's your loaders' limbs feeling today? Wasn't aware tanks can be operated without crews.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version