fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • November 23, 2024, 11:57:39 pm
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name  (Read 6640 times)

Michaelh139

  • Goin for 900,000...
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #15 on: April 17, 2011, 09:34:02 pm »

C:\Games\FOnline\screen_17-04-2011_15-07-17.jpg lotta people fight for reno
whatever this link thing is it doesn't work. :P
Logged
Whenever I say something, imagine \"In my opinion"/ being in the front of every sentence.
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #16 on: April 17, 2011, 09:37:43 pm »

hahhaa :D
funny..
we wait for your TC.


GL
Logged

wreese2u

  • Been walking these streets since last night...
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #17 on: April 17, 2011, 10:22:44 pm »

whatever this link thing is it doesn't work. :P
re done it
Logged
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #18 on: April 17, 2011, 11:07:30 pm »

Yeah was fun in reno
Logged

wreese2u

  • Been walking these streets since last night...
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2011, 11:12:17 pm »

Logged

LeMark

  • Tim & Tom & Ted Lawyer Agency
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #20 on: April 18, 2011, 01:36:27 am »

Was funny in Reno and in Klamath.
Logged

wreese2u

  • Been walking these streets since last night...
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2011, 03:46:29 am »

Was funny in Reno and in Klamath.
ehehehhee SWARM
Logged

Rascal

  • FOnline2!
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #22 on: April 18, 2011, 11:10:12 am »

taking klamath without snipers - brilliant tactic reese my sincere congratulations xD rotfl
Logged

maszrum

  • Soldiers of Thunderstorm
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #23 on: April 18, 2011, 11:43:41 am »

funny ? that was sad actually.. reno and klamath - that was slughter, not a real figth - numbers dont play
swarmed , of course - best excuse when one of teams lossing battle. i sugest you to gather much more players, maybe even make alliance with cs, hawks or some other active gang ;/


yea.. like rascal said, next time when you decide to fight in klamath, you should have much more snipers ;)
« Last Edit: April 18, 2011, 11:45:46 am by maszrum »
Logged

headshot

  • Killian
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #24 on: April 18, 2011, 08:47:38 pm »

ehehehhee SWARM




Agree with MSH and Rascal. Yesterday it wasn't fight at all. Just the shooting range.
Logged

Delta77

  • Just walk away.. and put and end to this horror
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #25 on: April 19, 2011, 10:40:25 pm »

its me or this reminds me mad max 2, a lot of gangs under the name dogs of war http://users.jam21.net/sandrab/Mad%20Max%20II%20Villains/The%20Dogs%20of%20War.htm .
You should join us, you have a full day to decide
Logged
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #26 on: April 19, 2011, 11:01:05 pm »

funny ? that was sad actually.. reno and klamath - that was slughter, not a real figth - numbers dont play
swarmed , of course - best excuse when one of teams lossing battle. i sugest you to gather much more players, maybe even make alliance with cs, hawks or some other active gang ;/


yea.. like rascal said, next time when you decide to fight in klamath, you should have much more snipers ;)

No we were not outnumbered maybe a little bit that's not the reason we lost , we were outgeared didn't have so many ba's/ca's/camk2 or even gauss pistols and the most important thing we lack specialized manpower like snipers , sneakers etc. etc. that leads to the lack of advanced tactics we barely had men to keep an eye on the grids. Bunch of BG's with miniguns and RL's don't have much fighting chance against a well organized and selected attack.

There will be changes , we are constantly improving.
Logged

wreese2u

  • Been walking these streets since last night...
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2011, 12:06:16 am »

funny ? that was sad actually.. reno and klamath - that was slughter, not a real figth - numbers dont play
swarmed , of course - best excuse when one of teams lossing battle. i sugest you to gather much more players, maybe even make alliance with cs, hawks or some other active gang ;/


yea.. like rascal said, next time when you decide to fight in klamath, you should have much more snipers ;)
it was not slaughter, it was a swarm :D, the first battle in reno they were slaughtered inside of reno arms..
in klamath it WAS a slaughter, you were too well geared :D
Logged

JovankaB

  • Guest
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2011, 08:49:17 am »

it was not slaughter, it was a swarm :D, the first battle in reno they were slaughtered inside of reno arms..

And when 5 PKs kill a loner what is it? Not a swarm? Relatively it's a bigger swarm than when 5 people fight with 20.
You are swarming people every day, stop complaining if someone does the same to you, only on a larger scale.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 08:56:16 am by JovankaB »
Logged

wreese2u

  • Been walking these streets since last night...
  • Offline
Re: MDK will be remaking dark alliance under different name
« Reply #29 on: April 20, 2011, 08:53:49 am »

And when 5 PKs kill a loner what is it? Not a swarm? Relatively it's a bigger swarm than when 5 people fight with 20.
actually they did swarm us, they went from ever entrance and exit
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
 

Page created in 0.083 seconds with 26 queries.