fodev.net
15.08.2009 - 23.06.2013
"Wasteland is harsh"
Home Forum Help Login Register
  • September 17, 2024, 11:11:23 pm
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Play WikiBoy BugTracker Developer's blog
Pages: [1]
  • Print

Author Topic: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic  (Read 2532 times)

AexDestroy

  • Offline
And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« on: March 03, 2011, 06:22:06 am »
84 faction names gone in one day.  Suppose the devs never thought about the fact that rich assholes like making the game unplayable by others.  Or like all other issues of this nature you just laugh at our misfortune.
Logged

Lexx

  • Rotator
  • Mexican Apple Thief
  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2011, 06:44:11 am »
So, what Gameplay Help is this thread exactly?
Logged

Michaelh139

  • Goin for 900,000...
  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2011, 12:43:54 pm »
I'm honestly surprised that only a 400 or so population could take up over twice the amount of bases...  It's fascinating really how much we need those "connected to name" bases....
Logged
Whenever I say something, imagine \"In my opinion"/ being in the front of every sentence.

Wipe

  • Rotator
  • Random is god
  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2011, 01:09:58 pm »
Quote from: AexDestroy on March 03, 2011, 06:22:06 am
84 faction names gone in one day.  Suppose the devs never thought about the fact that rich assholes like making the game unplayable by others.  Or like all other issues of this nature you just laugh at our misfortune.

Please tell me from where you get this info, i'll be very glad. But take this hint first: thread with available names isn't updated every day but once per few days,week, depends on free names available.
Logged
Games are meant to be created, not played...

cannotspace

  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2011, 02:18:13 pm »
Why not just allow players to choose their own faction name.

Sure you might get dumb names like "SuPeR Pwnz0rr" but who cares?
Logged

Andr3aZ

  • Endless forum lurker
  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2011, 02:31:31 pm »
Quote from: Lexx on March 03, 2011, 06:44:11 am
So, what Gameplay Help is this thread exactly?

It shows new players how to do it wrong.
Logged

Izual

  • Roaming entertainer.
    • Youtube
  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2011, 02:32:08 pm »
Quote from: cannotspace on March 03, 2011, 02:18:13 pm
Why not just allow players to choose their own faction name.

Sure you might get dumb names like "SuPeR Pwnz0rr" but who cares?

This is off-topic and has been discussed many times:
Logged
My Youtube channel.

"Another problem is that we listen to the vocal players, who in many cases are wrong-headed."
- J.E. Sawyer

dskpnk

  • The Amboy Dukes
  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2011, 03:00:03 pm »
Why not just allow a gang to buy more than one base/faction names ?
Logged

Bandole

  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2011, 05:16:51 pm »
Ive tried yesterday to buy a base and lost one hour testing the intire list names...
Logged

Xarr

  • Former Troll
  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2011, 06:40:44 pm »
Quote from: cannotspace on March 03, 2011, 02:18:13 pm
Why not just allow players to choose their own faction name.

Sure you might get dumb names like "SuPeR Pwnz0rr" but who cares?

This idea is well

Dev's could open (again?) a thread with the Names and Devs Choose them

Also I am aviable to Pick the good ones out so i sent them to Devs (Wipe?) and they choose again that they wont have so much work.

If this is acsept from Devs, I open a Forum-Accout for this.
Logged
I used to be a bag of dicks, but then I grew up. I gave many of you guys a hard time, but on the other side I kept myself busy with helping players, and I never gave up on that.

Still, the FOnline community is a thing of it's own class.

Lexx

  • Rotator
  • Mexican Apple Thief
  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2011, 06:43:24 pm »
There is some bug right now that makes new faction names not possible to take. We are working on it.
Logged

AexDestroy

  • Offline
Re: And another ridiculously failed in game system works its magic
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2011, 07:06:53 pm »
Quote from: Wipe on March 03, 2011, 01:09:58 pm
Please tell me from where you get this info, i'll be very glad. But take this hint first: thread with available names isn't updated every day but once per few days,week, depends on free names available.

The list was updated 2 days ago with the patch.
I know where the list is and there were 84 new names put onto it.
And same as Bandole, I tried ALL the names on the list to no avail.

Quote from: Bandole on March 03, 2011, 05:16:51 pm
Ive tried yesterday to buy a base and lost one hour testing the intire list names...



Quote from: Lexx on March 03, 2011, 06:43:24 pm
There is some bug right now that makes new faction names not possible to take. We are working on it.

Where can we go to learn if/when this has been fixed??
Some of us have been waiting a long time to get a base, and its the only piece we still need for our gangs of friends that we play with.




*******And my apologies for my brash response here.  Was very frustrated at the time, and am sorry for blowin it up.
*******Glad to know its just a bug, and am looking forward to the resolution.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2011, 08:03:14 pm by AexDestroy »
Logged
  • Print
Pages: [1]
 

Page created in 0.109 seconds with 23 queries.