Other > General Game Discussion

Why cant we enslave raiders?

(1/3) > >>

Ulrek:
Alright. i can under stand why we cant enslave Khan raiders. those guys are just evil. but the little wannabes in the leather jackets are push overs anyway. marauder's are only a little better due to better gear.

Also, some of you might say "They're strong willed! they cant be broken!", well. we can already catch ghoul crazies. which are hostile ghouls killing everything insight. how can those be counted as weak willed? plus we can enslave bandits up north, but why do we have to walk all the way up north to catch a slave that won't insta die, that can use a crappy hunting rifle?

I'm just asking if there was any special reason the community knows as to why they're not catchable?

-Ulrek-

Alvarez:
Game balance, i guess.
Also, they rather die than serve, see Bitter Springs.

Ulrek:

--- Quote from: Alvarez on January 31, 2011, 05:58:53 PM ---Game balance, i guess.
Also, they rather die than serve, see Bitter Springs.

--- End quote ---

I said they weren't the Khan's, read the OP before you post please.

And how would having crappy raiders for slaves effect game balance?

-Ulrek-

Haraldx:
Yeah, you can get much better (http://www.fo2238.fodev.net/wiki/Homesteader) and much worse slaves (http://www.fo2238.fodev.net/wiki/Weak_Peasant). I want Raider wannabe's to be my slave!

Michaelh139:
A definite yes, there is no imba in this suggestion, it's simply good. (I know its more of a question which belongs in survival/game help but its a good suggestion if posted in the right area in my book)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page