Other > Suggestions

Bring back old colourizing

<< < (17/25) > >>

naossano:
It may be linked with someone's idea to have lists in Pipboy.

So you wont have to tag the head of the guy to have him on your list.

One problem will remain.
You should share your own list with you others own characters.
(more risk of abuse, but an huge comfort for player)

Maybe an encrypted namecolorizing, than can be used only by ten characters. (seems fair for a number of alts)

Izual:

--- Quote from: Rascal on June 13, 2011, 03:17:39 PM ---u really think that anyone gonna manually (for god sake!) mark hundreds of alts ?

--- End quote ---
But my dear, you're already doing that 8)

Rascal:
ofcooz im not my love , im not using that crappy system, i use crippled/retarded namecolorising (txt file linked with faction member list)
it works horrible, but even then its ten times better that  point and click manually crappy green tagging

answer me that Izual:

Why u dont want for PvP players (who are soil of this server) to have good working feature (full namecolorising system) , when all other players (RP,loners,etc) just DONT HAVE TO USE namecolorising. It doesnt make any differance for them! Not a bit! U can make ur manually point and click/ with even 10 colors for them if u want.

Crazy:

--- Quote from: Rascal on June 13, 2011, 04:28:35 PM ---answer me that Izual:

Why u dont want for PvP players (who are soil of this server) to have good working feature (full namecolorising system) , when all other players (RP,loners,etc) just DONT HAVE TO USE namecolorising. It doesnt make any differance for them! Not a bit! U can make ur manually point and click/ with even 10 colors for them if u want.

--- End quote ---

He just don't like PvP players and want them to suffer as much as possible. No other reason.

Izual:
None of your posts make sense, I think I'm going to do just like everybody else, stop replying :-\

Edit, @Rascal: If you want answers to your questions, read this keeping in mind 2238 is not a game based on PvP.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version