Other > Suggestions

NPC gunshot reaction and militia orders

<< < (2/3) > >>

Phallus Erectus:
Am I in Suggestions? Oh, what do you know, I AM! Let me spell it out for you: I SUGGEST Militia kill anyone who fires a gun at other players AND NPCs(Militia or guards) will react to gunshots and move to the location of the shot.

Sarakin:

--- Quote from: Phallus Erectus on October 14, 2010, 12:22:06 pm ---Am I in Suggestions? Oh, what do you know, I AM! Let me spell it out for you: I SUGGEST Militia kill anyone who fires a gun at other players AND NPCs(Militia or guards) will react to gunshots and move to the location of the shot.

--- End quote ---
Ehm, search function ? It was discussed over and over. Its not a good idea to grief in suggestions - you were killed there and now you want to change it. Its unguarded city, get it ?

Phallus Erectus:
No, no I don't get it. Ungaurded cities get taken over by gun toting gangs and militia kill them, but militia don't kill average joe maniac blue suit?

avv:
One can only guess whats the purpose of militia according to devs. With common sense it would be more rational if the militia didn't tolerate murderous actions from anyone. The players who control the town have taken over it so that they can defend its inhabitant. But why would the town allow murdering of travelling merchants who could bring prosperity to the town? No one can have anything against free trade right? In addition normal humans or ghouls don't enjoy watching other people being shot on sight. It's intimidating, loud and distressing. Imagine if there was a police in your country who shot every foreign person they saw.

But that's enough for common sense. I understand if town conquerors don't want every player to come freely in their town and rob the merchants from everything useful and replace them with junk items. But honestly, backora and Sarakin you don't have much credible to say why the militia shouldn't intervene in the wrongdoings of the defenders.

Sarakin:
If it was up to me, Id make remaining towns more or less guarded like someone already suggested ( Beerko ? ). We would still have 2 cities without militia + domination areas. Anyway avv, Im not against that feature, but majority of players (PKs) wouldnt welcome this suggestion, they want to have freedom in cities

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page